"I get most of my audio work done there before jumping into Avid."
Posted by: switthaus@mac.com
Reply via web post | • | Reply to sender | • | Reply to group | • | Start a New Topic | • | Messages in this topic (48) |
"I get most of my audio work done there before jumping into Avid."
Reply via web post | • | Reply to sender | • | Reply to group | • | Start a New Topic | • | Messages in this topic (48) |
BTW - if you are trying to fix mixed cadence (mixed shots all with 3:2 in a 59.94i timeline) in order to reconstruct a perfect 23.976p timeline, then the only flawless method I've found is Media Composer. You have to go shot-by-shot and yes it is painstaking, but it works.
24p HD Restoration There's a lot of good film content that only lives on 4×3 SD 29.97 interlaced videotape masters. Certainly in many cases you can go back and retransfer t... | |||||
Preview by Yahoo | |||||
Reply via web post | • | Reply to sender | • | Reply to group | • | Start a New Topic | • | Messages in this topic (47) |
First of all, these are the units I'm referring to: Teranex 2D, Processor, 3D Processor and Teranex Express.
Alchemist XF – Highest quality file based format and framerate conversion software - Snell Adva... A format and framerate converter, designed specifically for the file-based domain, Alchemist XF delivers even more quality, framerate wizardry and power than the Alchemist Ph.C-HD in a cost-effective software package. | |||||
Preview by Yahoo | |||||
Reply via web post | • | Reply to sender | • | Reply to group | • | Start a New Topic | • | Messages in this topic (46) |
Reply via web post | • | Reply to sender | • | Reply to group | • | Start a New Topic | • | Messages in this topic (7) |
Thanks for the clarification. This explains my confusion/misunderstanding. I think my discussions were centered around the Teranex Mini units as that's what many bought soon after BM acquired Teranex and they have been a subject on many L2 threads. With all the talk about about certain limitations and or shortcomings with the mini units I hadn't realized there was still a higher end product available. It didn't help that when I was talking to folks at Snell and Wilcox IIRC at a previous NAB a few years back discussing real time random cadence removal, which I'd been told couldn't be done with the BM Teranex units Snell and Wilcox people didn't point out I might be talking about the mini units and that there was higher end models still available.
So does anybody have experience with these more robust BM higher end Teranex units? Can they do real time cadence removal and are they more hardware based like the units of old or are they more software based units. My understanding of the BM Teranex line was it was a lot cheaper due in large part to the products no longer being based on big iron hardware.
I'm curious about Teranex in particular. I don't run those boxes but in what I've heard from users of the current products and those of the pre Black Magic products it seemed like the cheaper Teranexs offered by Black Magic didn't perform as well as the older hardware units. I'm not versed in their operation but it sure felt like yes they dropped the price but the features and quality dropped too for the users use to the older teranex product. This is the impression I got in random conversations but do the Black Magic Teranex boxes off all the features of their predecessors. Again I'm not a user of the products so I may be completely off the mark with what I have inferred over the past few years. Please edjamacate me on this.
Reply via web post | • | Reply to sender | • | Reply to group | • | Start a New Topic | • | Messages in this topic (45) |
I think it's important to think about which Teranex boxes we are talking about. BMD offers both the small mini-converters and the larger rack-mount models. The mini-converters have no relationship to what was marketed as the Teranex Mini before BMD. These small units are designed to fix single problems and may use some of the Teranex algorithms. Basically they carry the Teranex name. When you want to compare old versus new, compare the rack-mount models.
I'm curious about Teranex in particular. I don't run those boxes but in what I've heard from users of the current products and those of the pre Black Magic products it seemed like the cheaper Teranexs offered by Black Magic didn't perform as well as the older hardware units. I'm not versed in their operation but it sure felt like yes they dropped the price but the features and quality dropped too for the users use to the older teranex product. This is the impression I got in random conversations but do the Black Magic Teranex boxes off all the features of their predecessors. Again I'm not a user of the products so I may be completely off the mark with what I have inferred over the past few years. Please edjamacate me on this.
Reply via web post | • | Reply to sender | • | Reply to group | • | Start a New Topic | • | Messages in this topic (44) |
I have to disagree that you need something more than basic media composer color correction for broadcast television. Think of all the years we had just 4 TBC knobs and that went straight to the big 3 networks. I personally wouldn't want to color correct in a basic media composer because I have become accustomed to the relational symphony style color correction the boost speed. The extra features help too but in a pinch a Media Composer can do a reasonable job on a basic color grade.
Sure there a plenty of more powerful color correction applications that have their place when more color refinement is needed but in the documentary reality world I have no problem satisfying clients with a decent color grade. The added benefit of seeing everything in context is also an important reason for my series work. Perhaps in the Promo arena there is more budget and scrutiny so having a more advanced color system helps. I worked at one place that used Resolve while they did Avid offline for EPK and trailer work. After I showed them how much more efficient staying in Avid symphony for the finishing was they quickly switched from doing everything color wise in Resolve to doing most everything in symphony and bringing in Resolve when they felt something needed that added touch on certain shots or footage.
Baselight is a great addition to work side by side with symphony color correction to avoid the round trip gotchas.
Reply via web post | • | Reply to sender | • | Reply to group | • | Start a New Topic | • | Messages in this topic (43) |
What exactly was off in the media creations settings. Was the destination drive being blocked or filtered out by media creations check boxes. What settings did you change to get it to work.
> On Jul 14, 2016, at 9:00 PM, Terry Barnum terrydop@... [Avid-L2] <Avid-L2@yahoogroups.com> wrote:Terry Barnum
>
> Thanks for the quick response Mark! I already left the office but will check first thing in the morning.
>
> -Terry
>
> > On Jul 14, 2016, at 8:39 PM, Mark Spano <cutandcover@...> wrote:
> >
> > What's your Media Creation settings set to for drive destination? When you make an AAF with embedded media, MC needs to first create OMFI MediaFiles in the Media Creation drive setting. Then it embeds that data into the AAF for your destination. -5000 is a permissions issue for the Media Creation drive.
> >
> >> On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 11:35 PM, Terry Barnum terrydop@... [Avid-L2] <Avid-L2@yahoogroups.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> So a weird thing started happening this afternoon. When trying to export an AAF for ProTools it almost immediately fails with an OSErr:-5000. For an instant before the error it says Converting.
> >>
> >> I've tried unchecking anything in the export dialog to do with converting, different editor settings, trashing the MCState, Site_Settings.avs, Site_Settings.xml and Site_Attributes, but no change. The destination drive is definitely writeable—I can export a ProRes Proxy QT of the sequence there without problem. But if I try to export an AAF with embedded files of the sequence it fails.
> >>
> >> If the only thing I change in the export dialog is from 'embedded files' to 'output to folder,' the export works fine to the destination drive. Something about embedded is now breaking it.
> >>
> >> I've shutdown and restarted, run Disk Utility to repair permissions on the boot SSD, tried another project that exported an AAF earlier in the day but now fails, tried a new, simple sequence with 2 audio tracks, and tried exporting to the desktop, all without any luck.
> >>
> >> I've never seen this before. Any ideas on how to fix?
> >>
> >> MC8.4.4, MacOS 10.9.5, IO Express, FibreJet
> >>
> >> Of course we're under deadline so thanks for any suggestions!
> >>
> >> -Terry
> >>
> >> Terry Barnum
> >> digital OutPost
> >> Carlsbad, CA
> >>
> >> http://www.dop.com
> >> 800/464-6434
> >
> >
> >
>
> Terry Barnum
> digital OutPost
> Carlsbad, CA
>
> http://www.dop.com
> 800/464-6434
>
>
>
Reply via web post | • | Reply to sender | • | Reply to group | • | Start a New Topic | • | Messages in this topic (6) |