Saturday, September 28, 2024
Friday, September 27, 2024
Re: Good Evening Friend
The purpose of this proposal is not monetary and I will never ask you to send money in any way but only for humanity's motive which you're not obligated to accept.
My name is Arif Hussein Masduki and I am 67 years old. I am currently dealing with lung cancer.
According to the doctor's report, my time is short.
My son's future is causing me a lot of anxiety. He is only 17 years old
I can't picture him suffering when we leave this world. I only want to plead for him to come over to your country and Help me accept him as a son, friend, and brother to be his guardian. You don't have to spend any money on this as I promise to pay for whatever is going to cost to get him over there to start a new life. It came to my knowledge of the high rate of scam going round the internet and that's the reason I stated above that you will never be asked for any money but only to accept to be his guardian, i will pay for whatever is going to cost.
If you get back to me, I will clarify to you the reason for taking this bold decision to contact you in this manner.
Thanks
Arif Hussen Masduk
Best Regards!
09/28/2024
Wednesday, September 25, 2024
Re: [Avid-L2] 5.1 Fold Down to Stereo Math Quiz for today?
Groups.io Links:
You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#136497) | Reply To Group | Reply To Sender | Mute This Topic | New Topic
Your Subscription | Contact Group Owner | Unsubscribe [administrator242.death@blogger.com]
Tuesday, September 24, 2024
Re: [Avid-L2] 5.1 Fold Down to Stereo Math Quiz for today?
Van Oldenbarneveltstraat 33
6512 AS Nijmegen, the Netherlands
+31 6 21817248
If you want to send me large files, please use:
https://videotoolshed.wetransfer.com/
On 24 Sep 2024, at 21:36, John Moore <bigfish@pacbell.net> wrote:[Edited Message Follows]
Nice article. It's interesting that one of the choices involves a 90 degree phase shift to avoid undesirable signal cancellation. I understand a 180 degree phase shift is reversing the polarity of the signal. I can envision what a perfect sine wave shifted 90 degrees looks like compared to the original sine wave but a complex audio waveform with several sinusoidal esk waveforms is harder to picture. Is the particular signal being time shifted relative to the other signal and then later un timeshifted?Here's part of the article:Stereo downmix settings:
All the stereo downmix options except Direct Render are created by first creating a 5.1 downmix
from the 7.1 render of .atmos content, and then downmixing from 5.1 to 2.0 in the same manner as 2.0
consumer products. The choice of the 5.1 downmix method above affects the subsequent 5.1 to 2.0 downmix.
Lo/Ro - default: Downmixes from 5.1 to Stereo using the coefficients:
Lo = L + (–3 dB × C) + (–3 dB × Ls)
Ro = R + (–3 dB × C) + (–3 dB × Rs)
Lt/Rt (Pro Logic II): Downmixes from 5.1 to Stereo using the coefficients:
Lt = L + (–3 dB × C) – (–1.2 dB × Ls) – (–6.2 dB × Rs)
Rt = R + (–3 dB × C) + (–6.2 dB × Ls) + (–1.2 dB × Rs)
Lt/Rt (Pro Logic II) w/Phase 90: Downmixes from 5.1 to Stereo using the coefficients:
Lt = L + (–3 dB × C) – (–1.2 dB × Ls) – (–6.2 dB × Rs)
Rt = R + (–3 dB × C) + (–6.2 dB × Ls) + (–1.2 dB × Rs)
Applies a 90 degree phase shift to Ls/Rs prior to feeding the downmix which reduces undesirable signal cancellation,
improves imaging, and enables proper matrix decoding. It is strongly recommended to use the 90-degree phase shift for
any Lt/Rt downmixes.
Re: [Avid-L2] 5.1 Fold Down to Stereo Math Quiz for today?
[Edited Message Follows]
Stereo downmix settings:
All the stereo downmix options except Direct Render are created by first creating a 5.1 downmix
from the 7.1 render of .atmos content, and then downmixing from 5.1 to 2.0 in the same manner as 2.0
consumer products. The choice of the 5.1 downmix method above affects the subsequent 5.1 to 2.0 downmix.
Lo/Ro - default: Downmixes from 5.1 to Stereo using the coefficients:
Lo = L + (–3 dB × C) + (–3 dB × Ls)
Ro = R + (–3 dB × C) + (–3 dB × Rs)
Lt/Rt (Pro Logic II): Downmixes from 5.1 to Stereo using the coefficients:
Lt = L + (–3 dB × C) – (–1.2 dB × Ls) – (–6.2 dB × Rs)
Rt = R + (–3 dB × C) + (–6.2 dB × Ls) + (–1.2 dB × Rs)
Lt/Rt (Pro Logic II) w/Phase 90: Downmixes from 5.1 to Stereo using the coefficients:
Lt = L + (–3 dB × C) – (–1.2 dB × Ls) – (–6.2 dB × Rs)
Rt = R + (–3 dB × C) + (–6.2 dB × Ls) + (–1.2 dB × Rs)
Applies a 90 degree phase shift to Ls/Rs prior to feeding the downmix which reduces undesirable signal cancellation,
improves imaging, and enables proper matrix decoding. It is strongly recommended to use the 90-degree phase shift for
any Lt/Rt downmixes.
Groups.io Links:
You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#136495) | Reply To Group | Reply To Sender | Mute This Topic | New Topic
Your Subscription | Contact Group Owner | Unsubscribe [administrator242.death@blogger.com]
Re: [Avid-L2] 5.1 Fold Down to Stereo Math Quiz for today?
Stereo downmix settings:
All the stereo downmix options except Direct Render are created by first creating a 5.1 downmix
from the 7.1 render of .atmos content, and then downmixing from 5.1 to 2.0 in the same manner as 2.0
consumer products. The choice of the 5.1 downmix method above affects the subsequent 5.1 to 2.0 downmix.
Lo/Ro - default: Downmixes from 5.1 to Stereo using the coefficients:
Lo = L + (–3 dB × C) + (–3 dB × Ls)
Ro = R + (–3 dB × C) + (–3 dB × Rs)
Lt/Rt (Pro Logic II): Downmixes from 5.1 to Stereo using the coefficients:
Lt = L + (–3 dB × C) – (–1.2 dB × Ls) – (–6.2 dB × Rs)
Rt = R + (–3 dB × C) + (–6.2 dB × Ls) + (–1.2 dB × Rs)
Lt/Rt (Pro Logic II) w/Phase 90: Downmixes from 5.1 to Stereo using the coefficients:
Lt = L + (–3 dB × C) – (–1.2 dB × Ls) – (–6.2 dB × Rs)
Rt = R + (–3 dB × C) + (–6.2 dB × Ls) + (–1.2 dB × Rs)
Applies a 90 degree phase shift to Ls/Rs prior to feeding the downmix which reduces undesirable signal cancellation,
improves imaging, and enables proper matrix decoding. It is strongly recommended to use the 90-degree phase shift for
any Lt/Rt downmixes.
Groups.io Links:
You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#136495) | Reply To Group | Reply To Sender | Mute This Topic | New Topic
Your Subscription | Contact Group Owner | Unsubscribe [administrator242.death@blogger.com]
Monday, September 23, 2024
Re: [Avid-L2] What is the purpose of Boris Title Studio Stand Alone App/Program?
Groups.io Links:
You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#136494) | Reply To Group | Reply To Sender | Mute This Topic | New Topic
Your Subscription | Contact Group Owner | Unsubscribe [administrator242.death@blogger.com]
[Avid-L2] What is the purpose of Boris Title Studio Stand Alone App/Program?
Re: [Avid-L2] 5.1 Fold Down to Stereo Math Quiz for today?
Van Oldenbarneveltstraat 33
6512 AS Nijmegen, the Netherlands
+31 6 21817248
If you want to send me large files, please use:
https://videotoolshed.wetransfer.com/
On 23 Sep 2024, at 20:56, John Moore <bigfish@pacbell.net> wrote:I have complete mix stems for our 2.0 and 5.1 mix. There is a short nat sound section that I think should be a bit louder, +6db to be exact. Listening to the 2.0 mix I added the necessary audio keyframes to the left and right mix stems to ramp up the +6db in the short nat sound section and ramping back to 0db after the ramp up. This sounds the way I would like it to have been mixed.My question is for the 5.1 mix stems can I apply the same +6db keyframe ramp up to the L,R,Ls,Rs & Center stems and have that effect the surround mix the same way. Also the center channel has the Nat Sound in it. It is my understanding, correct me if I'm wrong, that in ProTools they mix 5.1 and then fold down to the 2.0 stereo mix. I'm not clear on what the gain structure math is for the 5.1 to 2.0 fold down but I assume there is a formular as to how the various tracks are multed together to achieve the 2.0 mix.My log math is so long gone but I'm thinking I should apply the 6db lift to all those stems.John Moore Barking Trout Productions Studio City, CA bigfish@pacbell.net