On AS or on RTAS? Last time I tried (quite a few version ago), I could not stack AS fx on a single clip.
On 29 feb. 2012, at 20:30, timmangini wrote:
> You can stack audio suite effects. We frequently have a compression inside an EQ.
Congrats - and let us know if/when a subtitled version will be available
here in the states.
- Rich
At 09:56 AM 2/29/2012 -0800, you wrote:
>
>Hi, everyone,
>
>Tomorrow - here in Moscow -- the first feature film I directed premieres.
>This
>is a $6 million dollar romantic comedy starring the biggest stars in
>Russia (the
>title, roughly translated, is "8 First Dates"). While I am not fluent in
>Russian, I had a great translator and actors who understood enough English
>to be
>fantastic to work with.
>
>After directing the film, I edited the entire movie in just over two
>months so
>that we would be ready for the 8 March theatrical release.
>
>As usual, I have to thank everyone on this remarkable list for continuing to
>give me not only answers to many, many questions, but the ability to stay
>abreast of everything current and coming in post, as well as production.
>
>So, again, thank you all for everything!
>
>DD
>
>David Dodson
><mailto:davidadodson%40sbcglobal.net>davidadodson@sbcglobal.net
>818-541-1225
>818-523-0905 mobile
No, you were very clear. I was just thinking you were talking about the same thing I was thinking about and you weren't. And I totally misunderstood what you were saying. No biggie. Looks like we were agreeing in the most difficult way.
On Feb 29, 2012, at 11:41 AM, Terence Curren wrote:
> I knew there was a miscommunication somewhere. I need to work on being clearer in writing.
>
> --- In Avid-L2@yahoogroups.com, Jay Mahavier <jay_mahavier@...> wrote:
>>
>> Then I guess I miss understood your original response to the original post. The conversation was about 1 frame event. So when you were saying that the in and out were the same TC in tape editing it totally didn't make sense. I did not understand that you were talking about the out TC of the out going event and the in TC of the incoming event. I thought you were talking about the in TC and out TC of the same event being the same TC.
>>
>> Jay
>>
>> On Feb 29, 2012, at 10:49 AM, Terence Curren wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --- In Avid-L2@yahoogroups.com, Jay Mahavier <jay_mahavier@> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> <<The out TC in tape based editing has always been exclusive >>
>>>
>>> Exactly. But that doesn't match the visual way of counting frames which is what you do with film. When you make a splice, you don't count the end of that shot as the next frame of film.
>>>
>>> It's two different ways of thinking and I am not arguing one is better than the other. My only point was that going from one way of thinking to the other way is difficult for many making the transition.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ------------------------------------
>>>
>>> Search the official Complete Avid-L archives at: http://archives.bengrosser.com/avid/
>>> Yahoo! Groups Links
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> Search the official Complete Avid-L archives at: http://archives.bengrosser.com/avid/
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
You can stack audio suite effects. We frequently have a compression inside an EQ.
tim
--- In Avid-L2@yahoogroups.com, Lou Wirth <loutv@...> wrote:
>
>
>
> I should know this but can you stack Audio Suite plugins on an audio clip by option dragging on top of another audio suite effect (on Mac)?
>
> When you delete the top effect they all go and cant step into it so now way of checking that the bottom fx are still there.
>
> Lou
> Lou Wirth Productions
> 500Tamal Plaza, Suite 522
> Corte Madera, CA 94925
> www.louwirth.com
> 415-924-9411p
>
This would be Media Composer 2.2. HDV/25Mb should work if the files are already wrapped as OPAtom MXF.
The XDCAM EX 35Mb was first added in MB 2.8.3.
This customer is likely using Media Manager and can't upgrade the editor.
Bob
--- In Avid-L2@yahoogroups.com, Greg Huson <Greg@...> wrote:
>
> We're helping a client provide raw video to an end user - and the end user is running newscutter 6.2.13.
>
> I don't know what the MC equivalent is to that, but will the end user be able to import XDCamEX (35) ? Anyone running this now and know if XDCamEX can be imported without upgrading hardware?
>
> gh
> ----------------------------------------------------
> Greg Huson
> Secret Headquarters, Inc
> Post Production / Production
> Culver City, CA
> 323 677 2092
> www.DigitalServiceStation.com
> greg (at) SecretHQ.com
> facebook.com/greg.huson
> www.SecretHQ.com
>
We're helping a client provide raw video to an end user - and the end user is running newscutter 6.2.13.
I don't know what the MC equivalent is to that, but will the end user be able to import XDCamEX (35) ? Anyone running this now and know if XDCamEX can be imported without upgrading hardware?
gh
----------------------------------------------------
Greg Huson
Secret Headquarters, Inc
Post Production / Production
Culver City, CA
323 677 2092
www.DigitalServiceStation.com
greg (at) SecretHQ.com
facebook.com/greg.huson
www.SecretHQ.com
Just an update to this in case it can help anyone - C300 footage imports fine in to Mc 4.0.5. EXCEPT when using the 50fps mode to shoot slow motion footage. The camera drops down to 720p but Avid does not recognise the footage and throws up "unrecognized resolution" errors. We could only get it in by borrowing a 5.5 and using AMA. Maybe this will help point someone in the right direction.
Cheers,
Andi
--- In Avid-L2@yahoogroups.com, Andi Meek <kwikpasta@...> wrote:
>
>
> touche!
>
> To: Avid-L2@yahoogroups.com
> From: jeffsengpiehl@...
> Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2012 17:42:13 +0000
> Subject: [Avid-L2] Re: Canon C300 and MC 4.0.5 workflow...
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> You'd said upgrade to 6 is not an option- but what is really not an option is upgrade at all.
>
>
>
> Check.
>
>
>
> JDS
>
>
>
> --- In Avid-L2@yahoogroups.com, Andi Meek <kwikpasta@> wrote:
>
> >
>
> >
>
> > Thanks Jeff,
>
> >
>
> > Any other takers? Again, upgrade is not an option!
>
> >
>
> > Andi
>
> >
>
> > To: Avid-L2@yahoogroups.com
>
> > From: jeffsengpiehl@
>
> > Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2012 16:26:27 +0000
>
> > Subject: [Avid-L2] Re: Canon C300 and MC 4.0.5 workflow...
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> > Then step 1, upgrade to 5.5
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> > JDS
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> > --- In Avid-L2@yahoogroups.com, "ripvanmarlowe2000" <kwikpasta@> wrote:
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > Hi all, just posted this on the forums but thought I'd ask around here as well...
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > Does anyone have experience using Canon C300 footage in an MC 4.0.5? I see from the compatibility list
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > http://www.avid.com/US/products/Avid-Media-Access/features
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > that the XF plugin should work with 4.0.5. and indeed when we receive XF305 footage we can import it fine. AMA linking does not work however, although this is not a problem as long as we can import it the old fashioned way. Is C300 footage basically the same as XF305. The Canon website seems to suggest it is; MPEG 2 in an MXF wrapper.
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > Can someone verify that it does work in this version of MC? are there any other gotchas to look out for? Any problems with camera crew shooting Canon LOG? That sort of thing?
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > Any tips appreciated and in case you want to ask - no, we can't upgrade to MC6!
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > Hopefuly we'll get some test footage but failing that I'm just trying to be prepared.
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > Cheers,
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > Andi
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
> >
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
AFAIK, stacking AudioSuite efx cannot be done. Requires a mixdown, then put another effect on...
Curtis Nichols
Señor Editor
PCS Production Co.
Irving, Tx.
------------------
________________________________
From: Lou Wirth <loutv@mindspring.com>
To: Avid-L2@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, February 29, 2012 11:45 AM
Subject: [Avid-L2] stacking audiosuite fx
I should know this but can you stack Audio Suite plugins on an audio clip by option dragging on top of another audio suite effect (on Mac)?
When you delete the top effect they all go and cant step into it so now way of checking that the bottom fx are still there.
Lou
Lou Wirth Productions
500Tamal Plaza, Suite 522
Corte Madera, CA 94925
www.louwirth.com
415-924-9411p
------------------------------------
Search the official Complete Avid-L archives at: http://archives.bengrosser.com/avid/
Yahoo! Groups Links
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Hi, everyone,
Tomorrow - here in Moscow -- the first feature film I directed premieres. This
is a $6 million dollar romantic comedy starring the biggest stars in Russia (the
title, roughly translated, is "8 First Dates"). While I am not fluent in
Russian, I had a great translator and actors who understood enough English to be
fantastic to work with.
After directing the film, I edited the entire movie in just over two months so
that we would be ready for the 8 March theatrical release.
As usual, I have to thank everyone on this remarkable list for continuing to
give me not only answers to many, many questions, but the ability to stay
abreast of everything current and coming in post, as well as production.
So, again, thank you all for everything!
DD
David Dodson
davidadodson@sbcglobal.net
818-541-1225
818-523-0905 mobile
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
I should know this but can you stack Audio Suite plugins on an audio clip by option dragging on top of another audio suite effect (on Mac)?
When you delete the top effect they all go and cant step into it so now way of checking that the bottom fx are still there.
Lou
Lou Wirth Productions
500Tamal Plaza, Suite 522
Corte Madera, CA 94925
www.louwirth.com
415-924-9411p
I knew there was a miscommunication somewhere. I need to work on being clearer in writing.
--- In Avid-L2@yahoogroups.com, Jay Mahavier <jay_mahavier@...> wrote:
>
> Then I guess I miss understood your original response to the original post. The conversation was about 1 frame event. So when you were saying that the in and out were the same TC in tape editing it totally didn't make sense. I did not understand that you were talking about the out TC of the out going event and the in TC of the incoming event. I thought you were talking about the in TC and out TC of the same event being the same TC.
>
> Jay
>
> On Feb 29, 2012, at 10:49 AM, Terence Curren wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > --- In Avid-L2@yahoogroups.com, Jay Mahavier <jay_mahavier@> wrote:
> >
> >
> > <<The out TC in tape based editing has always been exclusive >>
> >
> > Exactly. But that doesn't match the visual way of counting frames which is what you do with film. When you make a splice, you don't count the end of that shot as the next frame of film.
> >
> > It's two different ways of thinking and I am not arguing one is better than the other. My only point was that going from one way of thinking to the other way is difficult for many making the transition.
> >
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------------
> >
> > Search the official Complete Avid-L archives at: http://archives.bengrosser.com/avid/
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
>
I should know this but can you stack Audio Suite plugins on an audio clip by option dragging on top of another audio suite effect (on Mac)?
When you delete the top effect they all go and cant step into it so now way of checking that the bottom fx are still there.
Lou
Lou Wirth Productions
500Tamal Plaza, Suite 522
Corte Madera, CA 94925
www.louwirth.com
415-924-9411p
We have client who refers to lower budget projects as 'walmart,' when indicating the price they expect to pay. So, I think I'm already working there. Of course, this client never refers to a project as 'Niemans,' or, hell, even 'Macy's'
________________________
Greg Huson
Secret Headquarters, Inc
Greg (at) SecretHQ.com
www.SecretHQ.com
DigitalServicsStation.com
On Feb 29, 2012, at 8:52 AM, "Terence Curren" <tcurren@aol.com> wrote:
>
>
> --- In Avid-L2@yahoogroups.com, John Heiser <jpheiser@...> wrote:
>
> <<Too many specs, variables, standards, frame rates, sizes, codecs, file
> > types, delivery media, bit rates, pixel aspects, blah blah blah. Sometimes
> > I just would rather work at Wal-Mart.>>
>
> I agree that there are far to many "standards". One of the advantages of the tape based world was that the R&D cost of coming up with a new format was so great it rarely happened. Now a guy in his garage can write yet another new codec and away we go….
>
> That said, I would never want to work at Walmart.
>
>
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Then I guess I miss understood your original response to the original post. The conversation was about 1 frame event. So when you were saying that the in and out were the same TC in tape editing it totally didn't make sense. I did not understand that you were talking about the out TC of the out going event and the in TC of the incoming event. I thought you were talking about the in TC and out TC of the same event being the same TC.
Jay
On Feb 29, 2012, at 10:49 AM, Terence Curren wrote:
>
>
> --- In Avid-L2@yahoogroups.com, Jay Mahavier <jay_mahavier@...> wrote:
>
>
> <<The out TC in tape based editing has always been exclusive >>
>
> Exactly. But that doesn't match the visual way of counting frames which is what you do with film. When you make a splice, you don't count the end of that shot as the next frame of film.
>
> It's two different ways of thinking and I am not arguing one is better than the other. My only point was that going from one way of thinking to the other way is difficult for many making the transition.
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> Search the official Complete Avid-L archives at: http://archives.bengrosser.com/avid/
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 11:52 AM, Terence Curren <tcurren@aol.com> wrote:
> **
>
>
>
>
> --- In Avid-L2@yahoogroups.com, John Heiser <jpheiser@...> wrote:
>
> <<Too many specs, variables, standards, frame rates, sizes, codecs, file
> > types, delivery media, bit rates, pixel aspects, blah blah blah.
> Sometimes
> > I just would rather work at Wal-Mart.>>
>
> I agree that there are far to many "standards". One of the advantages of
> the tape based world was that the R&D cost of coming up with a new format
> was so great it rarely happened. Now a guy in his garage can write yet
> another new codec and away we go….
>
> That said, I would never want to work at Walmart.
>
>
>
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
------------------------------------
Search the official Complete Avid-L archives at: http://archives.bengrosser.com/avid/
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Avid-L2/
<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional
<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Avid-L2/join
(Yahoo! ID required)
<*> To change settings via email:
Avid-L2-digest@yahoogroups.com
Avid-L2-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Avid-L2-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
I remember well the "aha" moment I had back in 1992 when I was jumping from a 1" linear bay to Avid when I finally understood "When you mark an in and an out without moving the timeline indicator, you have a one frame edit... how strange!"
I never cut film. I was a linear guy before Avid and the jump from EDL to timeline was definitely a big brain leap. The other "crazy" idea was that a dissolve didn't HAVE to start at the transition point.
Steve Hullfish
contributor: www.provideocoalition.com
On Feb 29, 2012, at 10:49 AM, Terence Curren wrote:
> --- In Avid-L2@yahoogroups.com, Jay Mahavier <jay_mahavier@...> wrote:
>
> <<The out TC in tape based editing has always been exclusive >>
>
> Exactly. But that doesn't match the visual way of counting frames which is what you do with film. When you make a splice, you don't count the end of that shot as the next frame of film.
>
> It's two different ways of thinking and I am not arguing one is better than the other. My only point was that going from one way of thinking to the other way is difficult for many making the transition.
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
