I've been shopping for a replacement Dell/HP tower workstation for a while now. I've read the Avid specifications and recommendations and have explored a number of Good, Better, Best options. CPU speed over core count is prominently stated. The balancing equation of speed and core count is a gray area. I've also noted a number of single CPU systems being certified.
I recently started using a Dell 7760 I9 11th Gen laptop for editing and find it performs surprisingly well for everyday HD file-based editing. I just ordered a Dell 7770 I9 12th Gen with even more horsepower and will compare that to the 7760.
My gut tells me I would like a tower workstation for the main edit suite, that's what I've used since Adrenaline. Yet, when I build a custom Dell or HP tower I feel as though I'm piecing together dated tech. Surprisingly not a single major OEM is offering native Thunderbolt support in their towers, and their optional TB boards are behind the curve. Nor will they divulge if/when they will offer native onboard TB support. The tower CPU options also seem to be lagging behind those found in their laptops.
My questions are:
Have CPU's reached a performance point where a single is sufficient and a dual setup doesn't justify the cost in non-effects heavy post?
Are towers even necessary any more for routine file-based editing?
Cheers,
Karl Knowles
Tallahassee, FL
_._,_._,_
Groups.io Links:
You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#135967) | Reply To Group | Reply To Sender | Mute This Topic | New Topic
Your Subscription | Contact Group Owner | Unsubscribe [administrator242.death@blogger.com]
_._,_._,_