Friday, July 15, 2016

Re: [Avid-L2] Re: Resolve 12.5

 

I have to disagree that you need something more than basic media composer color correction for broadcast television.  Think of all the years we had just 4 TBC knobs and that went straight to the big 3 networks.  I personally wouldn't want to color correct in a basic media composer because I have become accustomed to the relational symphony style color correction the boost speed.  The extra features help too but in a pinch a Media Composer can do a reasonable job on a basic color grade.

Sure there a plenty of more powerful color correction applications that have their place when more color refinement is needed but in the documentary reality world I have no problem satisfying clients with a decent color grade.  The added benefit of seeing everything in context is also an important reason for my series work.  Perhaps in the Promo arena there is more budget and scrutiny so having a more advanced color system helps.  I worked at one place that used Resolve while they did Avid offline for EPK and trailer work.  After I showed them how much more efficient staying in Avid symphony for the finishing was they quickly switched from doing everything color wise in Resolve to doing most everything in symphony and bringing in Resolve when they felt something needed that added touch on certain shots or footage.  

Baselight is a great addition to work side by side with symphony color correction to avoid the round trip gotchas.



---In Avid-L2@yahoogroups.com, <mactvman@...> wrote :

To answer your question is simple, based on your target audience.

If you are finishing for web, probably you don't need more than the Avid color corrector.

If you are finishing for Broadcast Televison, Blu-ray or Feature Film release, you need a bigger toolbox than a stock Media Composer provides. Not just in tool sets including power windows, noise reduction, grain adjustments and the like, but in the bit depth and how color is processed. Avid does not do well in that arena.  Footage gets posterized and noisy when you have to push colors too far.

The facility I work at primarily uses dedicated color systems (Nucoda).  However in our promo work for film and television we use the color correction available in Flame, and Baselight inside AVID to get this done.

The only reason we aren't using resolve yet, is we don't have blackmagic hardware.  We primarily use Nitris DX and AJA i/o hardware.

You can bet, however, that the moment we go to Blackmagic hardware, we will be using resolve for our promo work, it's free!

Dave Hogan
Burbank, CA


On Friday, July 15, 2016 2:05 PM, "switthaus@... [Avid-L2]" <Avid-L2@yahoogroups.com> wrote:


 
I guess my question is, how many of us (editors) really needs a color corrector of Resolves strength?  If not, why settle (at this point) for an NLE that is lagging behind all the others?


__._,_.___

Posted by: bigfish@pacbell.net
Reply via web post Reply to sender Reply to group Start a New Topic Messages in this topic (43)

Save time and get your email on the go with the Yahoo Mail app
Get the beautifully designed, lighting fast, and easy-to-use Yahoo Mail today. Now you can access all your inboxes (Gmail, Outlook, AOL and more) in one place. Never delete an email again with 1000GB of free cloud storage.

this is the Avid-L2

.

__,_._,___

No comments:

Post a Comment