OMG such a BFD over FPS this is just growdy to the max. Can you tell I'm going to be editing in the Valley tonight? Fur sure Fur sure I'll trim that 2 frames fur sure, NOT!!! Hey Buuuuddddy are we editing something FPS or fps tonight I don't want to gag the QC monkey with a spoon. ;-)
--- In Avid-L2@yahoogroups.com, Bogdan Grigoresco <bogdan_grigorescu@...> wrote:
>
> Mark,
>
> There is no standard, but most acronyms are all-caps, so I agree with you that FPS should be used for frames per second and I disagree with you on the other 2 forms(Fps and fps).
>
> BG
> www.finale.tv
>
> --- On Mon, 3/12/12, Mark Spano <cutandcover@...> wrote:
>
> From: Mark Spano <cutandcover@...>
> Subject: Re: [Avid-L2] Re: Standards
> To: Avid-L2@yahoogroups.com
> Date: Monday, March 12, 2012, 3:04 PM
>
> Bogdan,
>
> Please cite the source for this standard.
>
> My opinion is that FPS, Fps, and fps ALL stand for frames per second.
> Nobody I know ever anywhere uses fps for fields per second. There's no
> acronym for fields per second.
>
> -Mark
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 5:59 PM, Bogdan Grigoresco <
> bogdan_grigorescu@...> wrote:
>
> > **
> >
> >
> > 'I assume the QC person just does not know what 1080i/59.94 means exactly.'
> >
> > ...or the person who wrote the slate does not know the acronym for frames
> > per second is written with capital F
> >
> > BG
> > www.finale.tv
> >
> > --- On Mon, 3/12/12, Dom Q. Silverio <domqsilverio@...> wrote:
> >
> > From: Dom Q. Silverio <domqsilverio@...>
> > Subject: Re: [Avid-L2] Re: Standards
> > To: Avid-L2@yahoogroups.com
> > Date: Monday, March 12, 2012, 2:22 PM
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > I agree but the point was there is nothing technically wrong. There was no
> >
> > standard being broken.
> >
> > Even if you are being pedantic the slate is still correct.
> >
> > I understand if it was written "1080i/29.97"
> >
> > Then yes, that would be wrong but it was written as
> >
> > fps: 29.97
> >
> > I assume the QC person just does not know what 1080i/59.94 means exactly.
> >
> > Dom Q. Silverio
> >
> > On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 5:17 PM, Pat Horridge <pat@...> wrote:
> >
> > > Yup sounds about right had tape bounces for even less than that.
> >
> > > Broadcasters are often very strict as once you start to let standards and
> >
> > > requirements slip before long you have none!
> >
> > >
> >
> > > Sent from Pat's iPhone
> >
> > >
> >
> > >
> >
> > > ------------------------------------
> >
> > >
> >
> > > Search the official Complete Avid-L archives at:
> >
> > > http://archives.bengrosser.com/avid/
> >
> > > Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> > >
> >
> > >
> >
> > >
> >
> > >
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> Search the official Complete Avid-L archives at: http://archives.bengrosser.com/avid/
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
No comments:
Post a Comment