more specific, and accurate words...
In Filtering, I've found that changing from Real Time, to Gaussian gives
much more pleasing results. I also change the Path to Spline, for an
eased in and out.
Is this what you're talking about?
On 24/05/2010 07:12, Christopher Pitbladdo wrote:
>
> I don't suppose it's too hi-res if he wants to push right in and move
> the image around in the video frame...
>
> Have you checked the (I think it's called interpolation or scaling
> method) selection? It needs to be on Gaussian(I think), rather than
> the default. And then, as john suggests, rendered.
>
> Sorry for being vague, but I'm not in front of the Avid.
>
> ***
> Christopher Pitbladdo
> Digital Buddy
> 496 Ferry Road
> Edinburgh
> EH5 2DL
> Tel: 0131 552 553 0
> Mob: 07590 570 683
> www.digitalbuddy.co.uk
>
> Credit list available at www.digitalbuddy.co.uk/creditlist.pdf
>
> On 24 May 2010, at 06:59, "johnrobmoore" <bigfish@pacbell.net
> <mailto:bigfish%40pacbell.net>> wrote:
>
> > How are you comparing the images. Are you doing a blow up in PS and
> > then importing and comparing that to Pan and Zoom? This may be
> > obvious but you do have to render the Pan and Zoom otherwise your
> > seeing a low quality proxy like image. I know I was confused by this
> > at first but it sounds like you already know that. What type of
> > project are you in. 2K by 2K isn't that big for HD.
> >
> > --- In Avid-L2@yahoogroups.com <mailto:Avid-L2%40yahoogroups.com>,
> "chlowden" <christopher@...> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hello
> > > At the moment I am working on a graphics / illustration project in
> > the avid. I have to do loads of pan and zooms and I am having a real
> > problem with the way the Avid deals with high quality tiff files.
> > When I do a very large zoom into a 2040x2040 300dpi image in
> > photoshop or preview, it holds up fine. The detail is there and
> > there is no pixel or softening. Yet I use the same image in Avid Pan
> > and Zoom and it either becomes soft or, for the Avid HQ settings,
> > the image has a strange halo effects on all the contours,
> > particularly with illustrations. What is strangest is that the
> > result is different between mac and pc. Has anyone got any idea how
> > I can get results like those that I have in photoshop?
> > >
> >
> >
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
------------------------------------
Please donate to the Red Cross to help those in earthquake ravaged Chile: http://tinyurl.com/y8pgceq
Search the offical complete Avid-L archives at: http://archives.bengrosser.com/avid/
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Avid-L2/
<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional
<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Avid-L2/join
(Yahoo! ID required)
<*> To change settings via email:
Avid-L2-digest@yahoogroups.com
Avid-L2-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Avid-L2-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
No comments:
Post a Comment