My experience of "Motion Compensated" Alchemist conversions is that you will be guaranteed to have artifacts, certainly if the video includes any text/graphics or images that rotate (e.g. the wheels on a car). Obviously, you can switch the Motion Compensation off, but for a conversion to progressive output like this you'll just be stuck with frame blending instead.
Cheers,
David
On Thu, 14 Apr 2022 at 09:33, Tony Quinsee-Jover <tony@hdheaven.co.uk> wrote:
If you want the best results, guaranteed to be artifact free, then this is definitely the best route. It makes for an easy workflow too - you only do the one conversion when everything is finished.
Cheers,
Tony
Sent by magic over t'interweb
> On 14 Apr 2022, at 09:27, editbruboy <bruno@bmansi.co.uk> wrote:
>
> I would try and investigate if some sort of hardware standards converter (Alchemist?) might be a better solution. So you complete your project at it's native frame rate and get it converted afterwards.
_._,_._,_
Groups.io Links:
You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#135775) | Reply To Group | Reply To Sender | Mute This Topic | New Topic
Your Subscription | Contact Group Owner | Unsubscribe [administrator242.death@blogger.com]
_._,_._,_
No comments:
Post a Comment