I consciously hid that information since it's an expansion of the originating problen - however and: but yes, you are right.
Alas, this stupid default affects any imported graphics (with alpa), and nonetheless: it's disqulifying. It's 2016 as the writing of this eMail. Sifting through Avid-L and Avid-L2 there are only two occurances of this issue, the earliest dating back to September 2013 - and I'm around since a decade before that. Sums up to:
So Avid MC is capable of doing 4K but defaults (DE-FAULTS!) to this SD-comliance setting? Come on, girls & guys! This ain't lazyness…
Me being a postpro sup and knowing where to take things to make the product shining - this undocumented feature is not: a feature. It's disqualifying. And a reaon my title finishings are never ever has been in Avid MC.
Jo
> On 12.05.2016, at 04:23, John Pale pale.edit@gmail.com [Avid-L2] <Avid-L2@yahoogroups.com> wrote:
>
> It's worse than that, as it also softens imported still
> Graphics, even if the software they were created in already made them SD compliant....making them doubly soft. Unless you know about the console command, you just end up with bad fuzzy graphics
>
>
>
>
> On Wednesday, May 11, 2016, Jo Hermann lists@filter-media.net [Avid-L2] <Avid-L2@yahoogroups.com> wrote:
>
> Came across this today - always thought Avid's title tool is "not soooo good" before I got aware; this toggle explaines it.
>
> WTF: it's 2016, why the heck I would need anyone to comply to SD?
>
> @Marianna: let them coders know: eitther a documented setting or default to "true" - since this is unacceptable!
>
> Sincerely
>
> Jo
>
>
>
Posted by: Jo Hermann <lists@filter-media.net>
| Reply via web post | • | Reply to sender | • | Reply to group | • | Start a New Topic | • | Messages in this topic (4) |
No comments:
Post a Comment