I know it's cool to be depressed and over-wrought in this forum and all, but, come on, that's just not even in the same zip code as the truth. You're really comparing a tool that can't even motion track a simple blur with Symphony?
I have my complaints like everyone but this is just too emo to let go.
Warmly on a warm day,
Seth Buncher
To: Avid-L2@yahoogroups.com
From: Avid-L2@yahoogroups.com
Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2014 10:30:14 -0700
Subject: [Avid-L2] Re: FCPX offline to MC for finishing
To: Avid-L2@yahoogroups.com
From: Avid-L2@yahoogroups.com
Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2014 10:30:14 -0700
Subject: [Avid-L2] Re: FCPX offline to MC for finishing
> For most things, X has better finishing tools anyway.
Isn't it sad that a consumer products company like Apple offers a product that has better finishing tools than a company that has spent 27 years focusing on post production tools for professional?
__._,_.___
Posted by: Seth Isaac Buncher <seth_buncher@hotmail.com>
| Reply via web post | • | Reply to sender | • | Reply to group | • | Start a New Topic | • | Messages in this topic (13) |
.
__,_._,___
No comments:
Post a Comment