We are very multicam/multigroup heavy with 9 plus cameras in a multigroup. Efx are minimal for most episodes. In light of that would I be correct to multiply 3.1 Mb/s by 9 cameras and let's just round it to ten so each edit bay would be pulling 31Mb/s? Or is it a smaller multiple because only one image from a multi group is playing and updating at a time. I don't spend much time in a multicam sequence as I'm onlining so I don't know if all the images in the 9 up display play in real time. I think they do, can someone confirm?
Given the heavy use of multigroup clips would that make it more advantageous to go with a single allocation group for the sake of bandwidth?
__._,_.___
Posted by: bigfish@pacbell.net
| Reply via web post | • | Reply to sender | • | Reply to group | • | Start a New Topic | • | Messages in this topic (4) |
.
__,_._,___
No comments:
Post a Comment