This IS the Avid L2: RE: Re: Re: [Avid-L2] RE: File Base Deliveries

Thursday, October 17, 2013

RE: Re: Re: [Avid-L2] RE: File Base Deliveries

How long does it take you to archive a one hour show to LTO?

---In Avid-L2@yahoogroups.com, <avid-l2@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

eeer, where did you get that?

LTO can run 1200 Mb per second. From my (slow) network connected drives i get real world performance to LTO of some 480 Mbits per second

HD video for delivery over here is 50 Mbits/s (XDcamHD), plus sound of course

IOW, LTO is about 9 times faster than RT.

But don't worry, FTP based delivery will be the future. No need for tape.

(But i agree it's not always practical, i have had glitches in Avid rendered MXF, so playing back the whole shebang for QC is still needed...)

Bouke

VideoToolShed
van Oldenbarneveltstraat 33
6512 AS NIJMEGEN, the Netherlands
+31 24 3553311

----- Original Message -----

From: tcurren@...

To: Avid-L2@yahoogroups.com

Sent: Thursday, October 17, 2013 3:27 PM

Subject: RE: Re: [Avid-L2] RE: File Base Deliveries

Only LTO is sooooooo much slower. Video tape is the original Real Time.

---In Avid-L2@yahoogroups.com, <avid-l2@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

Add the fact that LTO may soon be required delivery - your file based just became tape based again - linear tape.

Dom Q. Silverio

On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 2:58 PM, Shane Ross <shanerosseditor@...> wrote:

My biggest issue with tapeless delivery is you cannot "insert edit" fixes. Say you misspelled someone's lower third, or you spot a glitch. You can't simply insert a fix, cut to cut. You have to re-output the entire file again.

Barring that, I love it. Cheaper by far (no $300-$400 tapes and you needing to deliver 4-6 tapes...and then the deck ownership, or even rental)...simply deliver your files on a $100 USB drive.

On Wednesday, October 16, 2013 8:53 AM, "jeffsengpiehl@..." <jeffsengpiehl@...> wrote:

But also to people who've no clue on how to get a file to pass network QC. A broader market is possible, a stupider one however won't make the grade. You always get what you pay for.

---In avid-l2@yahoogroups.com, <wilsonchao@...> wrote:

HD tape I/O required a $25,000 deck connected to a $5,000 Mac running a free/pirated application. By eliminating that expensive gear, the market for HD post was opened to a wider market.

On Oct 16, 2013 9:06 AM, "Tony Quinsee-Jover" <tony@...> wrote:

On 16/10/2013 05:57, tcurren@... wrote:
> And tape output is bad because....?

... because it was easy and reliable, silly.

Outputting now is so much more... adventuresome.

T.