Good so I am seeing what you are seeing. Thanks for the clarification. I guess one man's softness is another man's squish. Wait I hope that didn't sound dirty. ;-)
--- In Avid-L2@yahoogroups.com, <tcurren@...> wrote:
>
> The gradients near the black kind of squish down, so there is less detail with flicker free on.
>
>
> ---In Avid-L2@yahoogroups.com, <avid-l2@yahoogroups.com> wrote:
>
> After feeding the Avid BW Ramp and cranking up the brightness I see a little difference in the "softness" of the final transition area. It's pretty slight of course the flicker of the bright side of the ramp makes it a little hard to see much of a difference. Am I missing something more obvious?
>
> --- In Avid-L2@yahoogroups.com mailto:Avid-L2@yahoogroups.com, <tcurren@> wrote:
> >
> > There is much less smearing than you would see on an LCD. It is still much faster refresh rate than LCD. But if you want to see what it does do, put up a black to white ramp and look at the area just near black when you turn flicker free on and off.
> >
> >
> > ---In Avid-L2@yahoogroups.com mailto:Avid-L2@yahoogroups.com, <avid-l2@yahoogroups.com mailto:avid-l2@yahoogroups.com> wrote:
> >
> > I rarely work in 23.98 but am on a project with my Sony PVM-2451 OLED and I see the flicker like always with flicker free off. Turning it on eliminates the flicker but I'm told this will introduce a smear to the image that is similar to what an LCD does. What kind of smear artifacts should I look for just so I can compare with flicker free off and on. Just want to know what losing the flicker might introduce in the displayed image and how to explain it to the client if the issue comes up.
> >
> >
> > John Moore
> > Barking Trout Productions
> > Studio City, CA
> > bigfish@
> >
>
Reply via web post | Reply to sender | Reply to group | Start a New Topic | Messages in this topic (5) |
No comments:
Post a Comment