Nope. HD. Point is that it's out there. Gonna be tough to put that genie back in the bottle. And yes, the director wanted to do all the repo's in post.
--- In Avid-L2@yahoogroups.com, "Terence Curren" <tcurren@...> wrote:
>
> Did you deliver 4K? Was it broadcast 4K? Did the home viewer have an option to omwatch 4K?
>
> Look at how many years we watched 35MM programming in SD.
>
> --- In Avid-L2@yahoogroups.com, "Scott" <switthaus@> wrote:
> >
> >
> > Hell, Epic 5k. Last two spots series. This guy is an ostrich.
> >
> > sw
> > --- In Avid-L2@yahoogroups.com, Tony Quinsee-Jover <tony@> wrote:
> > >
> > > Interesting perspective and persuasive argument but... I think he's wrong.
> > >
> > > Most of the jobs I'm quoting on these days are 2k or 4k. Just because Mr Bourbonais isn't being asked to shoot in 4k doesn't mean it's not already happening.
> > >
> > > SD is dead in my world. Even tiny corporate jobs destined for the web are HD.
> > >
> > > 4k is the new HD.
> > >
> > > Tony
> > >
> > > Sent by magic over t'interweb
> > >
> > >
> > > On 23 Aug 2013, at 20:20, "Terence Curren" <tcurren@> wrote:
> > >
> > > > http://broadcastengineering.com/hdtv/why-4k-wrong
> > > > <http://broadcastengineering.com/hdtv/why-4k-wrong>
> > > > I'm not feeling so alone anymore. :-P
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > ------------------------------------
> > > >
> > > > Search the official Complete Avid-L archives at: http://archives.bengrosser.com/avid/
> > > > Yahoo! Groups Links
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
| Reply via web post | Reply to sender | Reply to group | Start a New Topic | Messages in this topic (18) |
No comments:
Post a Comment