"That's the film counting method"
You sure it's not just the 'Avid counting method '?
I too started in film, then linear video, then linear with EDLs and then non-linear. The first time I ever encountered "inclusive Out" was on Media Composers. EDLs are exclusive Out, just like film. So's Quantel, and so's DS - hence the stupid double cursor thingy on DS (to provide 'compatibility' with MC).
Tony
Sent by magic over t'interweb
On 7 Jul 2013, at 02:35, "Terence Curren" <tcurren@aol.com> wrote:
> That's the film counting method vs. the videotape counting method. I started in film so the video method of counting a frame twice never made any sense, but I lived with it.
>
> --- In Avid-L2@yahoogroups.com, "scott_freeman_avid" <scott_freeman_avid@...> wrote:
>>
>> In an Avid if you are in a 23.976 1080p project and you export a quicktime movie (from the avid) the last frame will not appear in Final Cut Pro or Resolve - After Effects and Avid sees this last frame fine.
>>
>> - so the note is - In a 23.976 1080p Avid project, always export a quicktime movie with at least a 1 frame handle at the tail if delivering to Final Cut Pro or Resolve. The last frame is just hidden in those programs.
>>
>>
>> - scott freeman
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> Search the official Complete Avid-L archives at: http://archives.bengrosser.com/avid/
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
| Reply via web post | Reply to sender | Reply to group | Start a New Topic | Messages in this topic (4) |
No comments:
Post a Comment