Sure. So is fake 3D. But that's not the approach Cameron used. Otherwise he would not have gone to 4K, and taken 60 weeks to redo the project.
Again, I didn't see the IMAX. Was anyone here left underwhelmed by it?
RT
On Jun 14, 2013, at 11:39 AM, Terence Curren wrote:
> Fake IMAX is a marketing gimmick. The original IMAX frame size was huge. (very expensive) You can see what I mean here: <<http://static.ddmcdn.com/gif/imax-film.gif>>
>
> --- In Avid-L2@yahoogroups.com, Richard Tibbetts <huipro@...> wrote:
>
> <<Speaking of 3D and 4K, the IMAX/3D releases of Titanic in 2012 were built from an expensive and painstaking 4K "remaster" of the original super-35 film. >>
>
>
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
------------------------------------
Search the official Complete Avid-L archives at: http://archives.bengrosser.com/avid/
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Avid-L2/
<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional
<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Avid-L2/join
(Yahoo! ID required)
<*> To change settings via email:
Avid-L2-digest@yahoogroups.com
Avid-L2-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Avid-L2-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
No comments:
Post a Comment