In what I have read, 4K is the ideal resolution for scanning in 35MM which has a resolution of about 3.5K. That would put proper IMAX at more than 12K.
--- In Avid-L2@yahoogroups.com, Richard Tibbetts <huipro@...> wrote:
>
> Sure. So is fake 3D. But that's not the approach Cameron used. Otherwise he would not have gone to 4K, and taken 60 weeks to redo the project.
>
> Again, I didn't see the IMAX. Was anyone here left underwhelmed by it?
>
> RT
>
> On Jun 14, 2013, at 11:39 AM, Terence Curren wrote:
>
> > Fake IMAX is a marketing gimmick. The original IMAX frame size was huge. (very expensive) You can see what I mean here: <<http://static.ddmcdn.com/gif/imax-film.gif>>
> >
> > --- In Avid-L2@yahoogroups.com, Richard Tibbetts <huipro@> wrote:
> >
> > <<Speaking of 3D and 4K, the IMAX/3D releases of Titanic in 2012 were built from an expensive and painstaking 4K "remaster" of the original super-35 film. >>
> >
> >
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
| Reply via web post | Reply to sender | Reply to group | Start a New Topic | Messages in this topic (45) |
No comments:
Post a Comment