If my memory is good, the DNX 175 is in YUV and the prores is in RGB ...
Thomasset Ghislain
Tel : 06 23 16 50 52
>________________________________
> De : electropura212 <electropura212@gmail.com>
>À : "Avid-L2@yahoogroups.com" <Avid-L2@yahoogroups.com>
>Envoyé le : Jeudi 25 avril 2013 6h11
>Objet : Re: [Avid-L2] DNxHD115 versus ProRes MXF - quality difference?
>
>
>Its comparable to ProRes 422 for that frame rate. DNX 175 would be
>comparable to Pro Res HQ.
>These are the standard "native" resolutions for HD work on Avid. ProRes
>MXF support is a relatively new addition to Avid.
>
>
>On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 11:33 PM, michaeljshen76 <mikejshen@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> **
>>
>>
>> Hoping some codec gurus can help me.
>>
>> One of my students mistakenly transcoded all of the footage for his
>> 30-minute documentary to DNxHD 115. The rest of the class is editing and
>> finishing their films in ProRes MXF.
>>
>> Is there a quality difference between the two codecs? I've read much
>> suggesting they are roughly comparable.
>>
>> The project in question is 1080p 23.976. Most of the footage was shot on
>> the Sony NX-70, with a bit of HPX3100 and DSLR sprinkled in.
>>
>> We're all in serious crunch mode, so we'd prefer not to have to up-rez any
>> of the projects, especially since the student's media management is
>> unlikely to have been spotless.
>>
>> We'll run some comparison tests, but we don't have a terrific monitor at
>> the school; so any opinions are much appreciated. Thank you!
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
>------------------------------------
>
>Search the official Complete Avid-L archives at: http://archives.bengrosser.com/avid/
>Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
| Reply via web post | Reply to sender | Reply to group | Start a New Topic | Messages in this topic (3) |
No comments:
Post a Comment