Given they were sighting below 0IRE the arrowhead and it's composite nature seem appropriate to me.
--- In Avid-L2@yahoogroups.com, Mark Spano <cutandcover@...> wrote:
>
> Isn't the Arrowhead designed to show COMPOSITE GAMUT? And isn't that a
> baseband signal attribute? I hardly ever bother with that one, sticking
> with the split diamond and waveform/vectors. I always think if you're
> downconverting and broadcasting my stuff as composite video you're the one
> that has to deal with it.
>
> Maybe I'm being (what's the word) new-fashioned?
>
> (or just wrong)
>
>
> On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 5:53 PM, SP <sppomerantz@...> wrote:
>
> > **
> >
> >
> > Can you reveal the network that you were dealing with, or would that
> > result in more grief being thrown your way?
> >
> > Steve Pomerantz
> > www.stevepomerantzeditorial.com
> >
> >
> > --- In Avid-L2@yahoogroups.com, "johnrobmoore" <bigfish@> wrote:
> > >
> > > Correction the file is named, CRH 604A QC2.zip
> > >
> > > --- In Avid-L2@yahoogroups.com, John Moore <bigfish@> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Okay today's fun was a 25 minute conference call on what was deemed QC
> > issues in file based delivery. I was told my Red was too hot and some of
> > my video went down to or below 0IRE. Well I made screen grabs of all the
> > time codes and found nothing wrong according to my Tek wfm 7020 set to
> > tekronix default alarms. I sent those to the network and just spent 25
> > minutes to confirm that things are really at 7,5 IRE and the Red is legal
> > according to the Arrowhead and split diamond display. It was a nice
> > conversation if which I was told that they were under the assumption that
> > the "Arrowhead" display was not for SD. WTF? The arrowhead existed before
> > we had HD to deal with. At any rate if anyone is interested I uploaded a
> > file to the file section named QC Issues in SD Video. I would welcome any
> > enlightenment as to what is illegal in the signal. Even the specular
> > errors aren't enough to trigger the alarm. Just because the Red vector
> > goes past
> > > > the box it's nowhere near illegal on the arrowhead display. Somebody
> > tell me what I'm missing. Ultimately we agreed that the file was in fact
> > legal and they well do a secondary QC to make sure we don't need to
> > redeliver. I need a banana now. ;-)
> > > >
> > > > John Moore
> > > >
> > > > Barking Trout Productions
> > > >
> > > > Studio City, CA
> > > >
> > > > bigfish@
> > > >
> > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
No comments:
Post a Comment