Re: [Avid-L2] baselight vs symphony

Although Symphony's relational correction is pretty much unmatched and Avid
has all the technology they need to revamp the corrector (mainly in
SpectraMatte and AniMatte).

Sent from my mobile
On Apr 23, 2012 6:10 PM, "Job ter Burg (L2B)" <Job_L2@terburg.com> wrote:

> **
>
>
>
> OK, so then the question would be: should Avid spend R&D on creating a new
> color corrector (when there's industry standards like BaseLight, Resolve,
> Nucoda, Scratch out there), or should they just open up MC for others to
> plug into? Again, I feel the latter would be better for the product,
> whereas I feel that the first is what they're after.
>
> On 22 apr. 2012, at 18:14, Terence Curren wrote:
>
> > My guess is you are giving the AVX architecture more credit than it
> deserves. I constantly hear from third party vendors all the things they
> can't do because of AVX's limitations.
>
>
>

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

------------------------------------

Search the official Complete Avid-L archives at: http://archives.bengrosser.com/avid/
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Avid-L2/

<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Avid-L2/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
Avid-L2-digest@yahoogroups.com
Avid-L2-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Avid-L2-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/