First CMX / GVG / Sony / Ampex, then Lightworks / Avid and then FCP3-7 developed as very capable editors because they were used extensively by professionals on a day to day basis.
DS / Smoke similarly developed with a much higher signal to noise feedback from being used in high-end work by demanding editors / compositors.
I don't see PPro anywhere I work. Or hear about it much.
I do hope that PP6 has some great new features - but until it is having the crap kicked out of it by editors I don't think it will be up to the job. I hope to be proved wrong (because I *really* need to learn another system ;-).
and back to the OP.. thanks Terry for pointing this out and thanks Walter for letting us know your decision processes. (I thought it was going to be FCPx which Walter seems less cold on these days)
--- In Avid-L2@yahoogroups.com, George Loch <george@...> wrote:
>
> I find there is just an
> overall performance issue with PPro. I have a recent, very capable
> MacPro and PPro feels sluggish. When going from the source window
> controls to the sequence controls, I get a spinning beach ball every
> time. I really hope version 6 is a solid improvement because I am very
> close to dropping it and moving to MC 6.
>
No comments:
Post a Comment