and just how does that make sense? Let's replace 3D with something else.
If you notice the editing then you are not inside the story. And if you're not noticing the editing, then what's the point?
If you notice the cinematography then you are not inside the story. And if you're not noticing the cinematography, then what's the point?
If you notice the sound design then you are not inside the story. And if you're not noticing the sound design, then what's the point?
If you notice the writing then you are not inside the story. And if you're not noticing the writing, then what's the point?
How far do you want to go with that? I'm not trying to defend 3D, but I just want to know how that thinking makes sense.
Jay
On Sep 17, 2011, at 1:35 PM, David Dodson wrote:
> I disagree about AVATAR. If you've had the chance to watch it on Blu ray in 2D, it's even more spectacular and more immersive. The world seems somehow bigger, probably because you're making the imaginative translation into the story world, with all its artifice, rather than the stereo world, what with its "real" objects are now much smaller than real life. In other words the "literal" nature of stereo presentations makes the physical objects smaller than life, which is no good at all.
>
> And agreeing with Ian, if you notice the 3D then you're not inside the story. And if you're not noticing the 3D, then what's the point? It's that inherent paradox that makes 3D pointless except for theme parks.
>
> David
>
>
> On Sep 17, 2011, at 10:25 PM, Andi Meek wrote:
>
>>
>> If it's done well, by filmmakers who understand how to use it, it can be amazing. Avatar worked considerably better in 3D than in 2D because of the immersive world Cameron built and the way he used that space. Scorsese is doing it with Hugo. Just watch the trailer, you can see how it will work in 3D and i reckon it will look great. Unfortunately these films seem to be pretty few and far between, I agree though, 3D doesn't have a wide enough range of instances when it will significantly improve the story, like Ian says, limited to spectacle. Check out the trailer for Hugo;
>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iQNkETGfA6k
>>
>> Andi
>>
>> To: Avid-L2@yahoogroups.com
>> From: ijohnson2@earthlink.net
>> Date: Sat, 17 Sep 2011 09:45:36 -0700
>> Subject: RE: [Avid-L2] Not looking good fro 3D theatrically
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> I avoid 3D whenever I can (unless it's a free screening) but I am looking
>>
>> forward to A Harold and Kumar Christmas in 3D BECAUSE of the stupid 3D
>>
>> gimmicks. They have an excuse to use it for comedy and mockery of 3D. For
>>
>> most movies it needs to avoid calling attention to itself so as not to
>>
>> distract from the story. If I am engrossed in the story, I'm not noticing
>>
>> the 3D so there doesn't seem to be much point. If I admire the quality of
>>
>> the 3D and what it adds to the image, I am only looking at the movie rather
>>
>> than experiencing it.
>>
>>
>>
>> It would be ok to notice 3D if it is used in a way that helps tell the
>>
>> story, like the way camera movement, focus, composition, etc. are used as
>>
>> storytelling tools. Or in the case of Harold and Kumar, as gags. If it is
>>
>> only an overlay to subtly enhance the realism of the experience, then it is
>>
>> more in the category of surround sound, and I don't remember ever paying
>>
>> extra for a movie because it was shown with DTS.
>>
>>
>>
>> I think 3D as a premium is better suited to documentary subjects of the sort
>>
>> where the selling point is spectacle rather than story.
>>
>>
>>
>> Ian
>>
>>
>>
>> From: Avid-L2@yahoogroups.com [mailto:Avid-L2@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of
>>
>> Mark Myers
>>
>> Sent: Saturday, September 17, 2011 8:50 AM
>>
>> To: Avid-L2@yahoogroups.com
>>
>> Subject: Re: [Avid-L2] Not looking good fro 3D theatrically
>>
>>
>>
>> Good.
>>
>>
>>
>> Maybe filmmakers will have to actually create good stories instead of
>>
>> relying on stupid 3D gimmicks to put butts in the seats.
>>
>>
>>
>> Can we borrow Bill Clinton's sign and amend it to say "It's the STORY
>>
>> stupid!"
>>
>>
>>
>> Oh what am I saying. I want a pony too.... or maybe a Porsche.
>>
>>
>>
>> Mark
>>
>>
>>
>> Owner, Director
>>
>> SR Film & Video Productions
>>
>> 195 W Broad St
>>
>> Salunga PA 17538
>>
>> 717-393-5333 ex 142
>>
>> www.SR-Pro.com <http://www.sr-pro.com>
>>
>>
>>
>> Follow us on Facebook
>>
>> <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Salunga-PA/SR-Film-Video-Productions/13200182
>>
>> 0445>
>>
>> Linked In <http://www.linkedin.com/pub/mark-myers/8/488/746>
>>
>> Twitter <http://twitter.com/SRProductions>
>>
>>
>>
>> On 9/17/11 10:00 AM, Terence Curren wrote:
>>
>>>
>>
>>> http://filmdrunk.uproxx.com/2011/09/3d-is-fcked-basically
>>
>>>
>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>>
>>
>>
>> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>>
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------
>>
>> Search the offical complete Avid-L archives at: http://archives.bengrosser.com/avid/
>>
>> If you want to donate to Red Cross quake relief, you can do so through your cell phone. Text redcross to 90999 to make a $10 donation. It will be on your next cell bill.Yahoo! Groups Links
>>
>>
>>
>
> David Dodson
> davidadodson@sbcglobal.net
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> Search the offical complete Avid-L archives at: http://archives.bengrosser.com/avid/
>
> If you want to donate to Red Cross quake relief, you can do so through your cell phone. Text redcross to 90999 to make a $10 donation. It will be on your next cell bill.Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
If you want to donate to Red Cross quake relief, you can do so through your cell phone. Text redcross to 90999 to make a $10 donation. It will be on your next cell bill.
No comments:
Post a Comment