that I am not attacking your argument. I want to have a discussion.
I think that it is very easy to cut between sequences. I know that in
FCP you can have multiple sequences in tabs but in Avid you can call
up a bin from any project if you want to and load a sequence in the
source monitor and cut from sequence to sequence. I do this all the
time. I often like to create "selects" reels that I then edit from. I
also do multiple versions of traliers and spots and often cut sections
of one version to put into a different version. To me it's about as
fast as cutting from the source. Can you elaborate on why FCP is easier?
You consider the ease to be a problem. Why? Because if keeps you from
frame rates? That issue seems to have gone away with 4.0, though I
haven't played with it yet.
On Oct 3, 2009, at 4:22 AM, chlowden wrote:
>
> Don't forget the great advantage that Avid has over FCP. You can not
> easily cut between sequences. That alone keeps FCP out of the
> mainstream feature film market ...
>
>
>
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
------------------------------------
Search the offical complete Avid-L archives at:
http://archives.bengrosser.com/avid/
Avid L2, Where the Answers are.Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Avid-L2/
<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional
<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Avid-L2/join
(Yahoo! ID required)
<*> To change settings via email:
mailto:Avid-L2-digest@yahoogroups.com
mailto:Avid-L2-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Avid-L2-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
No comments:
Post a Comment