Re: [Avid-L2] 29.97 to 23.976 for a Series?

Optical flow is pretty good, but still can add artifacts.  Some shots it will just make a mess of, especially 2997 to 2398.

I still have my teranex if you want to try a hardware solution.  

________________________

Greg Huson

Secret Headquarters, Inc

GK Huson, LLC

Greg (at) SecretHQ.com

www.SecretHQ.com

On Apr 14, 2022, at 04:59, Agustin Goya | Wancamp via groups.io <agustingoya=gmail.com@groups.io> wrote:



I have the same issue but just for a few interviews. We are now in the process of testing Pixelstrings from Cinnafilm (https://cinnafilm.com/product/pixelstrings/) which costs ~$2 per minute for this type of convertion in HD resolution.

Maybe your friend can edit everything at 29.97 and then convert at the end.

HTH.

Agustín

On Thu, Apr 14, 2022, 05:33 Tony Quinsee-Jover <tony@hdheaven.co.uk> wrote:

If you want the best results, guaranteed to be artifact free, then this is definitely the best route. It makes for an easy workflow too - you only do the one conversion when everything is finished.

Cheers,
Tony

Sent by magic over t'interweb


> On 14 Apr 2022, at 09:27, editbruboy <bruno@bmansi.co.uk> wrote:
>
> I would try and investigate if some sort of hardware standards converter (Alchemist?) might be a better solution. So you complete your project at it's native frame rate and get it converted afterwards.