I'll add that I've done a lot of shows that were shot 29.97psf and my
delivery format is 59.94i. 59.94i is exactly the same as 29.97psf. So,
even though my delivery requirement is interlaced, the result is exactly
the same as the progressive shooting format. --J.B.
Jeff Hedberg jeff@unioneditorial.com [Avid-L2] wrote:
>
>
> We deal with US broadcast 29.97(interlaced) by working at 23.98
> (progressive) and adding 3:2 pulldown afterwards as mentioned by David.
> When the client wants a progressive video to post online, we give them
> the 23.98 master.
>
> Some of the distributors (Extreme Reach for example) will accept the
> 23.98 progressive file, and take care of adding the 3:2 conversion on
> their own.
> Our clients prefer this as they can check the masters on their
> computers 'without all those lines on the footage'.
>
> I haven't ever dealt with 29.97p delivery requirements. I will admit
> that if I saw that on a spec sheet I would assume that it was a typo.
> (I am also curious about who wants 29.97p for a final master)
>
>
> Jeff
>
> ------------------
> Jeff Hedberg
>
> Director of Operations
> Union Editorial
> 575 Broadway,6th floor
> New York, NY 10012
>
>> On Jan 24, 2018, at 11:13 AM, Mark Spano cutandcover@gmail.com
>> <mailto:cutandcover@gmail.com> [Avid-L2] <Avid-L2@yahoogroups.com
>> <mailto:Avid-L2@yahoogroups.com>> wrote:
>>
>>
>> One great reason for 24 to 29.97p is cross-platform delivery. So many
>> delivery requirements these days are demanding progressive delivery
>> so that there's no interlacing for streaming or web placement. It
>> makes sense. What also does not make sense is that many of these
>> requirements prohibit frame rates above 30, so a real 24 to 60
>> progressive pulldown is impossible. So you're stuck with 1:1:1:2
>> pulldown, which, yes, blows.
>>
>> On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 10:38 AM, David Rossspeckydave@gmail.com
>> <mailto:speckydave@gmail.com>[Avid-L2]<Avid-L2@yahoogroups.com
>> <mailto:Avid-L2@yahoogroups.com>>wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 24 January 2018 at 15:15, todhoplist@hillmanncarr.com
>> <mailto:hoplist@hillmanncarr.com>[Avid-L2]<Avid-L2@yahoogroups.com
>> <mailto:Avid-L2@yahoogroups.com>>wrote:
>>
>> I master for 29.97p and 25p release, and I really hate 24p to
>> 29.97p conversion (4:1 pulldown). So I hate this argument.
>>
>>
>> Hi Tod,
>>
>> Excuse my ignorance, but why would you need to convert 24p to 29.97p?
>> If it was for broadcast, I would either conform to 23.98 and then
>> add 3:2 pulldown, or standards-convert with a decent quality
>> converter (e.g. Alchemist/Teranex) and go 59.94i that way. Either
>> of those options look FAR better than the stuttering motion you
>> get from "4:1 progressive pulldown" in my opinion. And if you
>> don't like to use a standards converter because you're trying to
>> keep the progressive look of 24p, then just avoid any kind of
>> "Motion Compensated" or "Optical Flow" methods.
>>
>> Or is there some other reason for going to 29.97p?
>> Cheers,
>>
>> David
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
Posted by: john beck <jb30343@windstream.net>
| Reply via web post | • | Reply to sender | • | Reply to group | • | Start a New Topic | • | Messages in this topic (12) |
No comments:
Post a Comment