From my gut I would say that it's indeed just a force transcode, the same as if the source is not XDcam already, thus compensating for Canon's 'Close but no cigar' MpegII 50 Mbits.
And Job is right, XDcamHD is always 8 channels, and nowadays mandatory for broadcasting commercials over here.
On 29 Oct 2017, at 03:19, John Moore bigfish@pacbell.net [Avid-L2] <Avid-L2@yahoogroups.com> wrote:I see from a google search:If a sequence contained media from a Canon device, you could not export the sequence to an XDCAM device. You must enable the "Re-encode for XDCAM bitstream compliance" option in the XDCAM export settings dialog in order for this to work.If I am just exporting to XDCam50 mxf file this option is checked. I'm not exporting to a device but creating a .mxf file. Is there any downside to leaving this function checked. It would appear the spirit of the function is to enable sequences containing Cannon media to be exported to an XDCAM device. My sequence has no Cannon media so I guess it wasn't necessary to check this feature but I left it on just because it was the default setting. It does say that this will make the export take longer, which makes sense given it's re-encoding, but is there any reason to think this would effect compatibility of the resulting file. It seems like it wouldn't but I have no way of testing other than ama linking back to the file which seems to work fine.Any suggestions from those not watching the World Series?
__._,_.___
Posted by: Bouke <bouke@editb.nl>
| Reply via web post | • | Reply to sender | • | Reply to group | • | Start a New Topic | • | Messages in this topic (4) |
Have you tried the highest rated email app?
With 4.5 stars in iTunes, the Yahoo Mail app is the highest rated email app on the market. What are you waiting for? Now you can access all your inboxes (Gmail, Outlook, AOL and more) in one place. Never delete an email again with 1000GB of free cloud storage.
this is the Avid-L2
.
__,_._,___
No comments:
Post a Comment