When you say "phase-locked w. timecode" does that mean you feed tri-level or bi-level sync to cameras and feed everything from a master timecode generator locked to the same sync source?
In my limited experience time code alone doesn't gen lock camera sources. I've seen some RF systems that carry sync and time code information to cameras and I would assume any other equipment like the pro tools rig and the cinedeck etc....
---In Avid-L2@yahoogroups.com, <wilsonchao@...> wrote :
On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 2:15 PM, Jim Feeley jfeeley@... [Avid-L2] <Avid-L2@yahoogroups.com> wrote:Hey Everyone,
I'd love to hear your perspective as editors/post on this.
I do a fair amount of work as a location sound mixer. I'm thinking of buying a new hop to send audio from my bag to camera. But the thing is, I'm doing fewer jobs where we send high-quality audio to the camera. A lot more scratch track and/or timecode (or timecode & sync). I don't do much narrative and advertising work where I expect double-system. More news mag, documentary, and mid/high-level corporate (and I don't do much reality/unscripted, either). I wonder if my experience is anomalous, or if it matches what you all see. And what do you prefer?
Are you seeing more of some sort of double-system audio in the doc/public-affairs/corporate work you do?
How do you prefer to get and match audio? Sound on Tape (card/camera/whatever)? Scratch track on camera & separate audio files? TC or TC+Sync & separate audio files? Scratch & TC on camera & separate audio? Other?
Let's assume (since I own) Sound Devices audio recorders. I.e, top quality...not little Zooms or something.
And what do you expect sound on camera to increase or decrease in the coming years?
Thanks!
jim feeley
pov media
word image sound
Posted by: bigfish@pacbell.net
Reply via web post | • | Reply to sender | • | Reply to group | • | Start a New Topic | • | Messages in this topic (9) |
No comments:
Post a Comment