Owen's mobile device
On Apr 16, 2016, at 10:51 AM, David Dodson davaldod@gmail.com [Avid-L2] <Avid-L2@yahoogroups.com> wrote:
Agreed. Maybe not a ton of progress on some of the longer-standing, more perennial complaints, but big important stuff nonetheless.
On Apr 16, 2016, at 7:42 AM, 'Nigel Gourley' avid-l@outpostfacilities.co.uk [Avid-L2] <Avid-L2@yahoogroups.com> wrote:Not that I'm in any way condoning the bizarre pay structure but I would have said recently there have been a lot of improvements and they seem to be pretty fast..
Move from HD to 2K/4K and the rest, more audio tracks background rendering etc. DPP delivery, more files in and out DPX , LUT's colour stuff…. You could argue long overdue and more to go but I'd say there have been a lot of improvements and a much faster pace of change..
N
From: Avid-L2@yahoogroups.com [mailto:Avid-L2@yahoogroups.com]
Sent: 15 April 2016 20:23
To: Avid-L2@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Avid-L2] Avid says F/U to Symphony owners
That sure seems like what's happening after recent posts of various execs seemingly high compensation while Avid customers are left with very little improvements to the core product. Sure seems like Greed isn't all it's cracked up to be despite what sounds good in a movie line.
---In avid-l2@yahoogroups.com, <tcurren@...> wrote :It shows Avid going for the third party approach like they did with Title Tool instead of fixing the product.
It's part of the "take money from the company for the execs" approach to bleed it dry and then they will move on. The sooner that happens the better. Then we can hope someone who wants to improve the product buys the company.
Posted by: "owen@thenowcorporation.com" <owen@thenowcorporation.com>
| Reply via web post | • | Reply to sender | • | Reply to group | • | Start a New Topic | • | Messages in this topic (20) |
No comments:
Post a Comment