This IS the Avid L2: Re: [Avid-L2] How does 29.97P 1080 get converted to 720P?

Wednesday, December 16, 2015

Re: [Avid-L2] How does 29.97P 1080 get converted to 720P?

I agree with you - I'm saying the default mode for unattended machinery and personnel is to do it the worst way because it's the easiest. So 29.97p gets doubled into 59.94p. Simple. And bad.

If an actual quality-conscious person is doing a non-automated conversion, then yes, fields become frames and life is good. This is rare and the exception.

I understand what you mean (now) when you say PsF but you should not refer to any file as PsF, as that's incorrect. As I said before, PsF is a transfer vehicle, so a file which is P can transfer over SDI via PsF and/or be stored on an interlaced tape mechanism as PsF. But the file is P.

On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 5:53 PM, bigfish@pacbell.net [Avid-L2] <Avid-L2@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

If my source file show master is 29.97i aka 59.94i then it would be a disservice to double the frames and would that not look like 30 pairs of blended interlace mess in 720P 60? To keep the temporal resolution of interlaced material, sports especially, wouldn't each field of the 59.94i media get mapped into a single 720P frame? Or am I not reading enough sarcasm in your post? I'm using the term field for 1080i 59.94 material and Psf when it's 29.97P or 23.976P. Is that the proper engineering speak? I hear the two interchanged all the time and I usually understand it's meaning based on the context of the conversation but I'd like to get a proper terminology nerd badge here.

---In avid-l2@yahoogroups.com, <cutandcover@...> wrote :

If you have a 29.97 interlaced OR progressive file and you hand it off to some other person/machine to convert to 720/59.94p, the frames will be doubled. Simple. And if your video contained 2:3 pulldown, it will be a nicely blended mess.

The solution is if you know the delivery is 720/59.94p, and your source is 1080/23.976p, you add the pulldown in frames (not fields) and it's nicely preserved. I do this all the time for ESPN delivery.

"For an interlace 59.94 conversion I'd have to bet that each Psf becomes a unique 720P frame thereby maintaining the smoother motion so I just figure basically the same things happens when the source is 29.97P but that's an assumption that seems to be incorrect according to my QC chat."

If YOU were doing this conversion, then yes. Otherwise, assume that whatever the WORST way a conversion can happen, it'll happen that way.

On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 4:44 PM, John Moore bigfish@... [Avid-L2] <Avid-L2@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

Just spent some quality QC talk with a network we are delivering to and much to my disappointment they no longer accept 2:3 pulldown. Even though they can broadcast it just fine the ancillary interwebs and international concerns are the driving force for not accepting 2:3 pulldown. I completely understand that a 2:3 pull down doesn't technically fit in a 29.97P but still this makes me throw up in my mouth just a little bit.

So I asked the question to the Network QC folks. So if you broadcast in 720P how do my 29.97/sec full frames that are packed in a Psf structure of 2 Psfs per frame get distributed across the 59.94/sec 720P frames. I was told that the 29.97 full frames were doubled up in the process. They didn't seem completely certain about that so I'm looking for some clarification.

In my mind the simplest way the 29.97P to 720P conversion would happen is for each Psf to become one of the 720P frames. Now I'm curious how the conversion of 540 lines per Psf to 720 lines in 720P happens. But according to the chat I just had with Network QC what they say happens is the two Psf fields are combined to a full frame and that is the info that is packed into the 720P frame and they repeat the same frame so the 30 original frames are doubled into 60 frames.

For an interlace 59.94 conversion I'd have to bet that each Psf becomes a unique 720P frame thereby maintaining the smoother motion so I just figure basically the same things happens when the source is 29.97P but that's an assumption that seems to be incorrect according to my QC chat. Can someone beat me over the head with split frames until I can let this go? ;-)

John Moore Barking Trout Productions Studio City, CA bigfish@...