Ummmm, and now PhraseFind.
Again.
Tony
Or pluraleyes...
Mike
> On 19 Oct 2015, at 9:48 AM, 'Job ter Burg (L2B)' Job_L2@terburg.com [Avid-L2] <Avid-L2@yahoogroups.com> wrote:
>
>
> So no one thinks Avid could have jumped on this, as a the industry leader in our area?
> I mean, tools like Virtual Katy and Conformalizer, to name just two, were they so insanely revolutionary that Avid could not have developed them?
>
> It shows how little interest Avid has in what consider to be 'my' segment of the industry.
>
>> On 19 okt. 2015, at 08:37, Mark Spano cutandcover@gmail.com [Avid-L2] <Avid-L2@yahoogroups.com> wrote:
>>
>> they bring in the new AAF, compare to their own tracks, and slip/slide/snap their segments to match what's missing. Most often, actual communication happens too, where the editor will "say" what's different, so the mixer isn't out in the cold.
>
>
Mike
> On 19 Oct 2015, at 9:48 AM, 'Job ter Burg (L2B)' Job_L2@terburg.com [Avid-L2] <Avid-L2@yahoogroups.com> wrote:
>
>
> So no one thinks Avid could have jumped on this, as a the industry leader in our area?
> I mean, tools like Virtual Katy and Conformalizer, to name just two, were they so insanely revolutionary that Avid could not have developed them?
>
> It shows how little interest Avid has in what consider to be 'my' segment of the industry.
>
>> On 19 okt. 2015, at 08:37, Mark Spano cutandcover@gmail.com [Avid-L2] <Avid-L2@yahoogroups.com> wrote:
>>
>> they bring in the new AAF, compare to their own tracks, and slip/slide/snap their segments to match what's missing. Most often, actual communication happens too, where the editor will "say" what's different, so the mixer isn't out in the cold.
>
>
__._,_.___
Posted by: ANTHONY BREUER <tonybreuer@mac.com>
| Reply via web post | • | Reply to sender | • | Reply to group | • | Start a New Topic | • | Messages in this topic (48) |
this is the Avid-L2
.
__,_._,___
No comments:
Post a Comment