Difficult call.
I'd make the decision based on the live action. Is that shot 25PsF, or 1080i? If the latter then I'd insist on them following the specs otherwise the only items in the whole delivery that aren't interlaced will be the graphics and they'll stick out like a sore thumb regardless of motion blur. If however the live action is all progressive (with resultant 'real' motion blur) then go with their offering.
Tony
From: Avid-L2@yahoogroups.com [mailto:Avid-L2@yahoogroups.com]
Sent: 23 September 2015 12:45
To: Avid-L2@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Avid-L2] UK Production Graphics - interlaced or progressive?
Hi all, hoping to clear something up re: real world use vs broadcaster requirements
According to the DPP delivery standards,
"Electronically generated moving graphics and effects (such as rollers, DVE moves, wipes, fades and
dissolves) must be generated and added as interlaced to prevent unacceptable judder."
However, a graphics dept at an unnamed large production company are insisting that interlaced graphics look too 'clinical', andexclusively supply uncompressed progressive movs, with motion blur added, bar credit rollers, which they supply as intelaced for smooth motion.
I feel like I should insist on interlaced graphics as per DPP spec, but wanted some second opinions first.
Thanks
Posted by: "Tony Quinsee-Jover" <tony@hdheaven.co.uk>
| Reply via web post | • | Reply to sender | • | Reply to group | • | Start a New Topic | • | Messages in this topic (3) |
No comments:
Post a Comment