Is your sequence already rendered before mixing down? I think that might have been a factor on my sequence.
---In avid-l2@yahoogroups.com, <namyrb@...> wrote :
On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 9:16 AM, jfriend jfriend@... [Avid-L2] <Avid-L2@yahoogroups.com> wrote:There may be some confusion here between multiple "processes" (separate sw executables) and a process utilizing multiple "processors" (multiple hw CPUs). For example, MC and background transcode are separate sw processes, both/either may utilize multiple hw processors/CPUs.
On 6/11/15 11:46 AM, Michael Brockington mbrock321@... [Avid-L2] wrote:This might not be true any longer, Terry. I was testing render in-to-out the other day, on a dual 6-core, and it looked like CPU usage was above 1000 %. You've got me wondering, though; I'll double-check it today.
On 2015-06-11 6:23 AM, tcurren@... [Avid-L2] wrote:MC isn't using multiprocessors. ASFAIK the only process in MC land that does is the transcode process as that is newer code outside of MC.
Posted by: bigfish@pacbell.net
| Reply via web post | • | Reply to sender | • | Reply to group | • | Start a New Topic | • | Messages in this topic (6) |
No comments:
Post a Comment