"I'd get the finishing editor to finish in CC :-)"
And I'd get the offline editor to join the winning team for collaborative work at this stage of the game. Given the show is very straight forward I'm sure we can sort through it but it will be a time suck.
One thing I'm thinking might be a good idea is if we take the Alexa material and use Resolve to create Avid media that can be given to the Premiere editor to work with. I'm guessing that might make relinking things easier but this is just a guess on my part.
I know you can through most anything at Premiere will it swallow avid mxf media like DNX 36 or should I give the full res for offline at DNX 175X?
---In avid-l2@yahoogroups.com, <trevatpc@...> wrote :
There was one Pr CC2014 edit room at the French open, sitting on an ISIS/Interplay (which had quite a few Avid 7.0.4 attached).
The assistant reported that the AAF (cuts only, no multi groups) round trip worked well.
Mind you, the hover scrub was sucking oodles of bandwidth out of the system.
Didn't hear all the ins and outs but the cc editor abandoned cc and moved across to Avid a couple of days in.
I'm on cc for this current job and am liking it a lot. It has a different way of creating multi groups (a synced sequence is created - which becomes your multicam source) - so I doubt that groups would round trip very robustly.
Indeed you can stack your clips vertically in your timeline, then nest (collapse) them, then treat the nest as a multicam clip - which is pretty neat IMHO.
I've got to generate an audio AAF later this week for protools so I generated a couple of test files with mono/standard/5.1/adaptive tracks and got some folks at the duc to look at them: http://duc.avid.com/showthread.php?p=2271875#post2271875
They seemed to come across quite sensibly. Mono content in a stereo or adaptive timeline track got split out to a seperate track.
I'd get the finishing editor to finish in CC :-)
The assistant reported that the AAF (cuts only, no multi groups) round trip worked well.
Mind you, the hover scrub was sucking oodles of bandwidth out of the system.
Didn't hear all the ins and outs but the cc editor abandoned cc and moved across to Avid a couple of days in.
I'm on cc for this current job and am liking it a lot. It has a different way of creating multi groups (a synced sequence is created - which becomes your multicam source) - so I doubt that groups would round trip very robustly.
Indeed you can stack your clips vertically in your timeline, then nest (collapse) them, then treat the nest as a multicam clip - which is pretty neat IMHO.
I've got to generate an audio AAF later this week for protools so I generated a couple of test files with mono/standard/5.1/adaptive tracks and got some folks at the duc to look at them: http://duc.avid.com/showthread.php?p=2271875#post2271875
They seemed to come across quite sensibly. Mono content in a stereo or adaptive timeline track got split out to a seperate track.
I'd get the finishing editor to finish in CC :-)
__._,_.___
Posted by: bigfish@pacbell.net
| Reply via web post | • | Reply to sender | • | Reply to group | • | Start a New Topic | • | Messages in this topic (11) |
this is the Avid-L2
.
__,_._,___
No comments:
Post a Comment