For me, this is one of the areas I'd like to see more movement on from Avid; GPU acceleration and CPU optimisation. Everyone else seems to be pretty keen on taking advantage of CUDA/ OpenCL and it's near impossible to find any information about what Avid actually uses fully. As far as I can tell it's some Boris effects which seems a bit crap. If background render is coming, I want that render to be fast and not getting in the way of operating Avid the way that a background transcode currently seems to. Do others notice a noticeable drop in performance when using background transcode or is it just my old z400 showing it's age?
Andi
To: Avid-L2@yahoogroups.com
From: Avid-L2@yahoogroups.com
Date: Sat, 20 Sep 2014 10:23:25 -0400
Subject: Re: [Avid-L2] Re: best editor for H264?
DQS
On Sep 20, 2014, at 10:13 AM, "Oliver Peters oliverpeters@oliverpeters.com [Avid-L2]" <Avid-L2@yahoogroups.com> wrote:
Andi
To: Avid-L2@yahoogroups.com
From: Avid-L2@yahoogroups.com
Date: Sat, 20 Sep 2014 10:23:25 -0400
Subject: Re: [Avid-L2] Re: best editor for H264?
Newer Xeons do support it.
DQS
On Sep 20, 2014, at 10:13 AM, "Oliver Peters oliverpeters@oliverpeters.com [Avid-L2]" <Avid-L2@yahoogroups.com> wrote:
I don't believe that applies to Xeon processors, though. Only the Core i5 and i7 CPUs.- OliverPosted by: Dom Q. Silveriomodern Intel CPU has a built in acceleration of h.264 decode and encode. In some tests it is better than NVidia's implementation. Unfortunately, Avid does not support it.
__._,_.___
Posted by: Andi Meek <kwikpasta@hotmail.com>
| Reply via web post | • | Reply to sender | • | Reply to group | • | Start a New Topic | • | Messages in this topic (19) |
Improvements in Yahoo Groups Search
Searching for new groups to join is easier than ever. We've honed our algorithm to bring you better search results based on relevance and activity. Try it today!
.
__,_._,___
No comments:
Post a Comment