I found out from the offline editor he did use Ver. 7 and he didn't add any frame flex himself. The sources were whacky .avi files he imported or linked ama and transcoded. I will find out how he ingested the material and report back. It seems like the effect is not needed because when I delete it the image still matches the offfline reference in size and framing. Seems like it is acting sort of like motion adapters when you have a clip of a differing frame rate, although the motion adapters are necessary to the video frames so I don't see that with these effects.
---In Avid-L2@yahoogroups.com, <rogershuff@...> wrote :
Without testing, I think you are correct. Frameflex is invoked without any input from the editor if v7 or later detects a clip with a different raster to the current format (say dropping an SD clip into an HD sequence).
With Best WishesRoger Shufflebottomrogershuff@...
+44 7973 543660
On 15 Aug 2014, at 09:28, John Moore bigfish@... [Avid-L2] <Avid-L2@yahoogroups.com> wrote:Working on an online remotely and I have a sequence that has nested unknown effects. They all seem to be the same effect according to the sequence missing effects only report. The effect is listed as, "INT_EFF_SPATIAL_ADAPTER". I'm thinking this might be frame flex info from Ver. 7 and I'm on Ver. 6.5.4. I'm contacting the offline editor to see what the effect is in his timeline and what Avid version he is running. Anybody seen this? Am I on the right track. I'm upgraded to Ver. 8 on my dongle so I can move to Ver. 7 if needed. I just haven't got around to upgrading yet. Is this the time for moving forward? I have a partition ready just hadn't found the need for 7 until now.
__._,_.___
Posted by: bigfish@pacbell.net
| Reply via web post | • | Reply to sender | • | Reply to group | • | Start a New Topic | • | Messages in this topic (3) |
.
__,_._,___
No comments:
Post a Comment