I always make sure my still images are no more than 72dpi (without changing the dimensions, obviously), regardless of editing platform.
I'm not aware of any benefit of higher resolution when working with video - as far as I'm aware, it just eats memory and makes things take longer to render for no visual benefit. (Still images > 72dpi in FCP 7 is always a good way to invoke the beachball of death...)
I'm not aware of any benefit of higher resolution when working with video - as far as I'm aware, it just eats memory and makes things take longer to render for no visual benefit. (Still images > 72dpi in FCP 7 is always a good way to invoke the beachball of death...)
Though I'd be interested to hear from anyone who knows different.
D.
P.S. Thanks for the heads-up about XnView, Mike - looks very useful, and easier than Photoshop for simple batches.
On 15 August 2014 13:35, Roger Shufflebottom rogershuff@yahoo.co.uk [Avid-L2] <Avid-L2@yahoogroups.com> wrote:
Pan and Zoom is very picky about dpi - there was a thread on here recently.On 14 Aug 2014, at 16:33, 'Dom Q. Silverio' domqsilverio@gmail.com [Avid-L2] <Avid-L2@yahoogroups.com> wrote:This is unusual since DPI does not really apply to digital pixels.Dom Q. Silverio
__._,_.___
Posted by: David Ross <speckydave@gmail.com>
| Reply via web post | • | Reply to sender | • | Reply to group | • | Start a New Topic | • | Messages in this topic (9) |
.
__,_._,___
No comments:
Post a Comment