Wednesday, July 30, 2014

Re: [Avid-L2] Wacky timecode on AVCHD AMA

 

You may be interested in this follow-up to the timecode problems I had with 720p/23.98 AVCHD footage.  Now I don't believe it has anything to do with a corrupt project file.

As I noted earlier, when I AMA-ed the AVCHD clips into a new Avid project, the timecode was good. So I started working in that project to transcode them to DNxHD.  But, before transcoding, when I modified the clips to add a Tape Name -- which I do with other AMA files to help in later Re-linking and to keep media organized -- I noticed that the timecode went wacky again.  Same issue with the each frame count incrementing by 2 frames, then 3 frames, then 2 frames, etc.  A 3:12 (84 frame) clip suddenly showed a duration of 8:16.  (But plays at a normal rate.)

It appears by adding a Tape Name to the clip, Avid thinks the file must have been captured from a videotape, which in 720p would have been recorded with 60 fields and 2:3 pulldown.  So adding a Tape Name changes the way timecode counts the frames -- although I can't quite figure out the logic to it as it is only counting about 10 frames per second.  It doesn't change anything else -- still reads as 23.98fps etc. 

Craig Mikhitarian
ACM Productions, Ltd.



---In Avid-L2@yahoogroups.com, <bigfish@...> wrote :

Try moving the corrupt projects .avs folder out of the project fold and let Avid build a new one.  That has fixed an existing project when I opened bins in a new project and problems went away.


---In Avid-L2@yahoogroups.com, <CraigACM@...> wrote :

Thanks for all your suggestions.  I think I figured it out.  Wacky timecode is somehow related to something corrupt in that specific Avid project.  I created a new project and brought the clips in and the timecode is good.
Thanks for the responses.
Craig Mikhitarian

__._,_.___

Posted by: CraigACM@aol.com
Reply via web post Reply to sender Reply to group Start a New Topic Messages in this topic (13)

Yahoo Groups
Did you Know?
Learn about attachment settings in your groups.


.

__,_._,___

No comments:

Post a Comment