Seems like a simple case of looking at 30TC when you should be looking at 24TC. Are you in a 23.976 project? Or perhaps in an SD 23.976 project? SD project would show you 30TC. Switch project format to 1080/23.976p and you should get your 24TC back.
On Monday, July 28, 2014, John Pale pale.edit@gmail.com [Avid-L2] <Avid-L2@yahoogroups.com> wrote:
What happens if you modify timecode and enter the correct starting timecode (even though it already is correct)?
On Monday, July 28, 2014, CraigACM@aol.com [Avid-L2] <Avid-L2@yahoogroups.com> wrote:
I'm getting bad timecode on AVCHD clips from a Panasonic AF-100 camera, AMA-ed into Avid Symph 6.5.3. Initially I blamed the problem on the camera, but we looked at the same files with Panasonic's P2 Viewer (software) and the timecode runs normally. So, I'm guessing there must be a problem with the way Avid is reading the files.
The camera recorded at 23.976fps, and timecode was set to Free Run. Looking at the clips in the Avid, the timecode runs fast with the frame count skipping ahead in a pattern of 2 frames, 3 frames, 2 frames, etc. so that sequential frames have the following timecode frame numbers: :00, :02, :05, :07, :10, :12, :15 etc… However, Avid sees the correct start timecode of each clip. This results in the end timecode of a clip often being greater than the beginning timecode of the next clip. It is not a fatal flaw, as we can still work with the clips – they transcode to DNxHD and playback without any problem, except for the wacky timecode, which persists after transcoding. However, searching for in-points from a timecoded transcript is problematic, as there can be as many as 3 sequential clips that contain the particular timecode number you're looking for!
Console's AMA_PlugIns command indicates I have version 1.3 of the AVCHD plug-in, which appears to be the latest version available on the avid.com/ama website.
Anybody else experiencing this issue, or have any suggestions? We'll be getting other footage from this camera in the future and I'd like to figure out a solution. Thanks in advance for your knowledge and help!
Craig Mikhitarian
Posted by: Mark Spano <cutandcover@gmail.com>
| Reply via web post | • | Reply to sender | • | Reply to group | • | Start a New Topic | • | Messages in this topic (3) |
No comments:
Post a Comment