Thanks Dave. Appreciate you taking the time to explain the reasoning behind a random thought of mine!
While I understand what you are saying, I feel that policy can hold up future development by allocating resources to old versions. I certainly agree, for example, for patching version 6.x while v7 is in development, but after 7 is released, work on v6.x.x should be stopped under the theory that version 7.0 is everything the last version of 6.x ended up as with new features. Then that one gets patched until version 8... At what version does Avid decide NOT to update any longer?
Yeah, I know that it may not work like that in the real world but at some point you gotta say to the user, "that's it. you gotta upgrade". Just my humble opinion.
__._,_.___
Posted by: switthaus@mac.com
| Reply via web post | • | Reply to sender | • | Reply to group | • | Start a New Topic | • | Messages in this topic (12) |
.
__,_._,___
No comments:
Post a Comment