What if you used something like tweak rvio and just python scripted it ?
On 8 Jun, 2014, at 10:04 pm, "Rupert Watson rupert@root6.com [Avid-L2]" <Avid-L2@yahoogroups.com> wrote:
Nigel
I have just asked one of our support guys to set up a test with four OP-ATOM DNx captures to proxy with burnins as you require on a Z820 to see how long it takes.
I also did what you need in MediaComposer with the Timecode effect, which you can do, but the renders are horrendous and it requires human interaction and a copy of Media Composer (or four) to do it in parallel.
On 8 Jun 2014, at 15:21, Rupert Watson rupert@root6.com [Avid-L2] <Avid-L2@yahoogroups.com> wrote:
this is precisely the sort of thing we built ContentAgent for.
If you capture the primary files to a folder CA is watching it will do the rest for you automatically. it will even deliver the proxies to where you want them at the end.
On 7 Jun 2014, at 19:23, 'Nigel Gourley' avid-l@outpostfacilities.co.uk [Avid-L2] <Avid-L2@yahoogroups.com> wrote:
It's really whether we can keep up with the capturing… I can capture 4 streams easily but transcoding at 4 times realtime is harder esp with burn ins and also we'd have to work out how to translate the reel no etc into a burn in. So it might be I need more PC's to transcode than capture which seems wrong!
Platform1 2014 - "The Flexible Facility of the Future"
Wed 11th & Thur 12th June
Registered in the UK at: 4 Wardour Mews, London W1F 8AJ
Tel: +44 (0) 20 7437 6052
Company No. 03433253
__._,_.___
Posted by: "Mikeparsons.tv" <mikeparsons.tv@gmail.com>
| Reply via web post | • | Reply to sender | • | Reply to group | • | Start a New Topic | • | Messages in this topic (9) |
.
__,_._,___
No comments:
Post a Comment