Rupert,
Your reply came in on my cellphone and got lost...
Could you please re-send it?
Thx,
Bouke
VideoToolShed
van Oldenbarneveltstraat 33
6512 AS NIJMEGEN, the Netherlands
+31 24 3553311
van Oldenbarneveltstraat 33
6512 AS NIJMEGEN, the Netherlands
+31 24 3553311
----- Original Message -----Sent: Sunday, June 08, 2014 5:04 PMSubject: Re: [Avid-L2] Tape capture with ProxiesNigel
I have just asked one of our support guys to set up a test with four OP-ATOM DNx captures to proxy with burnins as you require on a Z820 to see how long it takes.I also did what you need in MediaComposer with the Timecode effect, which you can do, but the renders are horrendous and it requires human interaction and a copy of Media Composer (or four) to do it in parallel.
On 8 Jun 2014, at 15:21, Rupert Watson rupert@root6.com [Avid-L2] <Avid-L2@yahoogroups.com> wrote:
this is precisely the sort of thing we built ContentAgent for.If you capture the primary files to a folder CA is watching it will do the rest for you automatically. it will even deliver the proxies to where you want them at the end.
On 7 Jun 2014, at 19:23, 'Nigel Gourley' avid-l@outpostfacilities.co.uk [Avid-L2] <Avid-L2@yahoogroups.com> wrote:
It's really whether we can keep up with the capturing… I can capture 4 streams easily but transcoding at 4 times realtime is harder esp with burn ins and also we'd have to work out how to translate the reel no etc into a burn in. So it might be I need more PC's to transcode than capture which seems wrong!
Platform1 2014 - "The Flexible Facility of the Future"
Wed 11th & Thur 12th June
Registered in the UK at: 4 Wardour Mews, London W1F 8AJ
Tel: +44 (0) 20 7437 6052
Company No. 03433253
This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection is active.
__._,_.___
Posted by: "Edit B" <bouke@editb.nl>
| Reply via web post | • | Reply to sender | • | Reply to group | • | Start a New Topic | • | Messages in this topic (12) |
.
__,_._,___
No comments:
Post a Comment