I've also seen it done (and have had it done) in editorial, using tools like Resolve. Cheaper than an MC license. Can have a separate machine chewing on footage 24/7.
Biggest advantage is that 3rd party solutions offer some more capabilities (more CC options, burnins, etc.).
Not trying to diss AMA, though.
On 30 jan. 2014, at 00:17, Steve Hullfish <steve4lists@veralith.com> wrote:
I agree, on features, it is usually the "lab" or on-set dailies company that converts the original camera files, applies a LUT or some other color correction to it and delivers DNxHD MXF files and usually a bin that has a lot of meta-data already populated, including the linking information back to the camera original files.But if you've got a guy who's asking these questions, it's probably not THAT kind of production.
__._,_.___
| Reply via web post | Reply to sender | Reply to group | Start a New Topic | Messages in this topic (32) |
.
__,_._,___
No comments:
Post a Comment