If the purpose is to have multiple feeds on the 4K screen, then we don't need to make 4K programs.
If you honestly believe that average folks really want to throw away their perfectly good HD TVs (on which most are watching SD anyway) to buy a new 4K set that they can't really see a difference on, then you are smoking the same stuff the TV manufacturers are.
With the transition to HD, there was a noticeable difference in the average home viewing environment. And SD TVs were dying with HD replacements being cheaper then the original SD sets. Those same circumstances don't exist this time.
---In Avid-L2@yahoogroups.com, <avid-l2@yahoogroups.com> wrote:
On 31. okt. 2013, at 00:01, <tcurren@...>
<tcurren@...> wrote:
Your argument was valid 3 or 2 years ago, but that's how progress works. 4K is here already, Avid just killed the only system they had that could easily handle it, and you're becoming the garden gnome in their front yard.
K
<tcurren@...> wrote:
> With 20/20 vision, you have to sit 8 feet from a 60 inch TV to get a 20 percent improvement.But the point here Terry is that this math is faulty, lots of people see way better than 20/20, lots of people sit closer and like it (like them in the front rows in the theatre), and our multi purpose lives are pushing 4K anyhow; lots of people want a 4K screen to share their screens on, the high res screen playing multiple airplay inputs will be the new living room center.
Your argument was valid 3 or 2 years ago, but that's how progress works. 4K is here already, Avid just killed the only system they had that could easily handle it, and you're becoming the garden gnome in their front yard.
K
__._,_.___
| Reply via web post | Reply to sender | Reply to group | Start a New Topic | Messages in this topic (66) |
.
__,_._,___
No comments:
Post a Comment