This IS the Avid L2: Re: [Avid-L2] Green dot on MC7 sequences

Friday, September 20, 2013

Re: [Avid-L2] Green dot on MC7 sequences

Oops. Misread the problem. Ignore my response. Apologies.

On Friday, September 20, 2013, John Pale wrote:

I think dnx 36 is only available for transcode in progressive projects. That's why it needs a motion adapter.

On Friday, September 20, 2013, Mark Spano wrote:

Interesting. I wonder if you create a new sequence in this project and edit your green dot sequence into this new sequence, will the clips still have green dots? Can you refresh the motion adapters on this new sequence?

On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 2:52 PM, <nick@paddywack.co.uk> wrote:

I have noticed that if I match back to the master clips and edit them back in to the timeline they lose their green dot. So nothing wrong with the clips it's just the refresh of the motion adapters on the sequence that isn't working.

--- In avid-l2@yahoogroups.com, <nick@...> wrote:

If only it was that simple! The Field Motion column shows the clips correctly as interlaced. Basically the refresh motion adapters doesn't seem to be working. Well not on our sequences anyway.

--- In avid-l2@yahoogroups.com, <cutandcover@...> wrote:

Check the bin column "Field Motion". All your clips should say "Interlaced". If they say "Unknown" then this is the problem.

On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 8:41 AM, <nick@...> wrote:

We have a load of sequences that have been offlined at DNx36 at 1080p.
The original footage is all 1080i Canon MXF.
When I link to the hi rez footage for online in a 1080i project all the Canon footage comes up in the timeline with a green dot. I've tried refreshing the motion adapters etc. but no change. If I go into the motion tool it shows Input as interlaced and output as interlaced. The footage seems to play OK and looks properly interlaced but I'm wondering why the green dot?

It's a 1080 50i PAL project, I'm onlining on MC 7.0.2 but the original material was mostly consolidated and transcoded on MC 6.5.

Any ideas? thanks Nick

Reply via web post Reply to sender Reply to group Start a New Topic