If it makes you feel any better, I'm running a PC GTX 670 on my 3,1 Mac Pro
with no problems. I only switched it out recently for the old 8800 GT so
that I could use rEFInd to dual boot with Fedora 19.
I've heard that the flash actually requires some soldering so you might not
want to go with that route.
On Sunday, August 18, 2013, Dom Q. Silverio wrote:
> **
>
>
> The Mac edition is the same as the PC version except for native Mac EFI
> support (similar to BIOS), allowing the Mac computer to access the GPU
> before the OS level. Almost any modern NVidia PC GPU will work on the
> Mac with prior mentioned EFI caveat. The great thing about the GTX680 is
> it has the processing power of the K5000 at consumer pricing.
>
> The CS6 Mercury Playback Engine "hack" is not really a hack. It is just
> manipulation of an internal text list of approved GPU. You just add your
> GPU to the MPE list. You do the same thing for Avid's ACPL GPU qualified
> list.
> http://www.studio1productions.com/Articles/PremiereCS5-2.htm
>
> The PSU of the 5,1 Mac Pro is 980 watts if I am not mistaken. That
> should be sufficient. I don't understand why the GTX680 power demand
> would be more than what the computer can handle considering it has 2
> dedicated GPU 16x slots. 2 GPUs on a Mac should be more than the 190
> watts demand of single GTX680 Mac Edition.
>
> Yes EVGA is the only company.
>
> On 8/18/2013 3:54 AM, John Moore wrote:
> > I'm going to try the EVGA CTX-680 mac edition card in my 12 core mac pro
> 5.1. I'm pretty sure Avid will be fine but thought I should ask the
> collective. I also read a bunch of talk about using the PC version of the
> card which has 4GB of ram while the mac edition only has 2GB. It seems the
> PC version doesn't support the Flash Screen, which I think is the startup
> and shut down screen. There was talk about flashing the PC card, I assume
> to get the startup screen etc..., and also there was some hack to get some
> of the Adobe CC suite or CS6 apps to see the card. Not sure if I would want
> to mess with all that but it seems like for GPU only use the PC card is a
> better choice so if I ended up with an expansion chassis that might be a
> way to go. I also read a suggestion of adding a separate power supply just
> for the GPU to avoid, "Frying the mother board...." I read the GTX-680 is
> more power efficient than other cards which is why it works with
> > just the two mother board power connections. Anybody think the
> motherboard is at risk with this card?
> >
> >
> > >From all my searching it seems EVGA is the only company making a mac
> edition of the GTX-680. Am I missing any other company to consider.
> >
> >
> > John Moore
> > Barking Trout Productions
> > Studio City, CA
> > bigfish@pacbell.net <javascript:_e({}, 'cvml',
> 'bigfish%40pacbell.net');>
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------------
> >
> > Search the official Complete Avid-L archives at:
> http://archives.bengrosser.com/avid/
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
------------------------------------
Search the official Complete Avid-L archives at: http://archives.bengrosser.com/avid/
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Avid-L2/
<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional
<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Avid-L2/join
(Yahoo! ID required)
<*> To change settings via email:
Avid-L2-digest@yahoogroups.com
Avid-L2-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Avid-L2-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Sunday, August 18, 2013
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment