This IS the Avid L2: [Avid-L2] Re: DS is EOL

Wednesday, August 7, 2013

[Avid-L2] Re: DS is EOL

You have a point.

And the funny thing is, I don't have a problem "bolting on" (and paying for) solutions that address my particular workflow.

However, Avid has not provided a seamlessly integrated API for 3rd parties. Just ask anyone who has used NewBlue and Baselight. I can't speak to Eyeon as I have not used it.

--- In Avid-L2@yahoogroups.com, "Mikeparsons.tv" <mikeparsons.tv@...> wrote:
>
> The way I see it is there is no free lunch.
>
> When boxes cost a million bucks you could expect and demand the best in class in every aspect. Which we got in flame or Henry back in the day. At 100k in avid you got a solid editor at a certain resolution but less vfx firepower.
>
> As time moved on you got more power on avx and other plugins but the power of the core system has remained somewhat static albeit cheaper to buy into. The same in flame and smoke.
>
> It's actually a factor of being a mature product. There are few amazing new features. Big fixes don't sell systems so are low priority. Cheap software doesn't allow for expensive programmers so we see feature creep rather than innovative leaps. That's life.
>
> Cmx died cos once you had a 340x or a 3400 or a 3600 there was never a need to upgrade. Avid was similar until the file based need to update arrived - 7.1 was all you needed for offline.
>
> We live in a pc tv world. Software in boxes for a few hundred dollars. It's all so damn cheap there's no point whinging. If it doesn't do what you want but another one for a few hundred bucks. At a certain point expectations have to be limited by cost of entry it's
> Simple economics.
>
> Mike
>
> On 7 Aug, 2013, at 9:47 PM, "blafarm" <blafarm@...> wrote:
>
> > Precisely my point.
> >
> > How can a product whose toolsets have been blatantly ignored for 10-15 years, and which are are woefully obsolete by any measure, be classified as the best editor on the planet?
> >
> > Media Composer is not a modern, integrated postproduction tool -- it is $999 core product that requires thousands of additional dollars of software in order for it to be competitive with features of a $299 Apple product.
> >
> > --- In Avid-L2@yahoogroups.com, "Tony Quinsee-Jover" <tony@> wrote:
> > >
> > > Yes, but MC is 'the best editor on the planet' so why should you care?
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Avid-L2@yahoogroups.com [mailto:Avid-L2@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of
> > > blafarm
> > > Sent: 07 August 2013 14:37
> > > To: Avid-L2@yahoogroups.com
> > > Subject: [Avid-L2] Re: DS is EOL
> > >
> > > Ok, let's see:
> > >
> > > We won't fix the Title Tool -- but you can buy the full version of NewBlueFX
> > > Titler Pro for $200.
> > >
> > > We won't fix the Color Corrector -- but you can buy the Filmlight Baselight
> > > plugin for $995.
> > >
> > > We won't fix the Effects Architecture -- but you can buy one of serveral
> > > Eyeon products for real cash money.
> > >
> > > Am I detecting a trend here?
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --- In Avid-L2@yahoogroups.com, "Scott" <switthaus@> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > more info:
> > > > http://provideocoalition.com/ssimmons/story/it-looks-like-avid-is-fina
> > > > lly-going-lay-ds-to-rest
> > > >
> > > > I love the offer at the end. You get a free MC7 license if you are a DS
> > > owner but have to pay $1500 for Symphony to get tools inferior to the
> > > product the company just killed. Avid marketing at its best. Gotta just
> > > laugh....
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>