Really Mike? Care to clarify? Hmmmm?
--- In Avid-L2@yahoogroups.com, "Mikeparsons.tv" <mikeparsons.tv@...> wrote:
>
> Actually no all the good illusion stuff was incorporated into DS so... Hmm ignore that...
>
> On 20 Aug, 2013, at 7:38 PM, "Scott" <switthaus@...> wrote:
>
> > <sarcasm filter on>
> >
> > What? Say it ain't so! You mean Avid had their hands on a really powerful system but decided to let it die so their own, less capable products look better? No friggin' way. That's just folly! Avid would never be that dim....
> >
> > <sarcasm filter off>
> >
> > ;-)
> >
> > --- In Avid-L2@yahoogroups.com, Jay Mahavier <jay_mahavier@> wrote:
> > >
> > > I really liked Illusion. I didn't get to use it for long, but I had hopes for it. Same for AudioVision.
> > >
> > > Jay
> > >
> > >
> > > On Aug 19, 2013, at 2:15 PM, Terence Curren wrote:
> > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --- In Avid-L2@yahoogroups.com, "ksirul" <kenavid2@> wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > "It is ABSURD that we still need a 3rd party plug to do moves with large stills. Avid used to have a product that handled this perfectly, with the ability to mask and use with any other effect in a composite.....I forget what they called it."
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Illusion? (Sorry, couldn't resist)
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > ------------------------------------
> > > >
> > > > Search the official Complete Avid-L archives at: http://archives.bengrosser.com/avid/
> > > > Yahoo! Groups Links
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
| Reply via web post | Reply to sender | Reply to group | Start a New Topic | Messages in this topic (13) |
No comments:
Post a Comment