Just be careful what you wish for. Over in flame and smoke land we have resolution independence - had it got years - but the cost is an engine that must render - to ensure playback of stereo 4k for example - we still have to render dissolves. In 2013.
And EVERYTHING else.
I'm five with it as its a finishing system in my mind and absolute guaranteed playback of everything at perfect quality is more important than being able to quickly try a few dissolve durations.
Reliable multi resolution playback comes with a different set if requirements. Either you tell everyone 32 disk raids or you can't play or you allow for single stream playback and force rendering - there are a few alternatives starting to appear such as caching to a fusion io but again there's a cost $$ and time.
Mike
On 29 Jul, 2013, at 1:29 AM, "Job ter Burg (L2B)" <Job_L2@terburg.com> wrote:
>
> Or compared to 1996 Lightworks.
>
> On 28 jul. 2013, at 19:31, namyrb <namyrb@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > FCPX's instant playback and scrubbing
> > is incredibly fast and smooth compared to what we have.
>
>
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
| Reply via web post | Reply to sender | Reply to group | Start a New Topic | Messages in this topic (36) |
No comments:
Post a Comment