If people actually sat close enough to a large monitor to see the difference between 4K and 1080, they would be terribly distracted by all the compression artifacts from getting the signal to the house.
PS: If H.265 is such the wonder drug they are trying to promote, why not use it with 1080 and give us 4:4:4, 10 or 12 bit at home? then we could all using existing infrastructure?
Oh that's right, the manufacturers wouldn't be able to foist their false planned obsolescence down our throats.
--- In Avid-L2@yahoogroups.com, Tony Quinsee-Jover <tony@...> wrote:
>
> In our lounge, with a 42" screen, and sitting around 15' away, we can't see the difference between SD and HD, so 4k would be a complete waste of time.
>
> Our anecdotal observation agrees with that chart.
>
> T.
>
> Sent by magic over t'interweb
>
>
> On 13 Jul 2013, at 17:10, "Terence Curren" <tcurren@...> wrote:
>
> > All this so the TV manufacturers can sell more sets to people who won't be able to resolve the difference between 4K and 1080.
> >
> > You can check if you'll be able to see the difference in your home setup here:
> >
> > <<http://referencehometheater.com/2013/commentary/4k-calculator/>>
> >
> > --- In Avid-L2@yahoogroups.com, Tony Quinsee-Jover <tony@> wrote:
> >
> > "Rupert was at our place when we met a client who was saying (more or less, and among other things) "So, we'll be shooting and finishing in full 4k. Now, how do we stream this across the web?""
> >
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------------
> >
> > Search the official Complete Avid-L archives at: http://archives.bengrosser.com/avid/
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
>
| Reply via web post | Reply to sender | Reply to group | Start a New Topic | Messages in this topic (20) |
No comments:
Post a Comment