> owen wrote:
> i'm willing to bet edit co's would like to capture
> the revenue from applying the dp's LUTs to dailies.
> this is an add'l charge for someone. more sources
> of revenue move away from editorial.
While my sentiment matches yours, that hasn't been my actual experience. I've done a number of jobs for out-of-town production companies that involved file conversions, adding LUTs and syncing double-system sound. This was required precisely because the editorial company (also in a different town) specified that the production company deliver one-light, sync'ed edit-ready "dailies" in ProResLT format. So that was revenue I earned and they didn't. And yes, Resolve has been a great tool for that.
- Oliver
__._,_.___
| Reply via web post | Reply to sender | Reply to group | Start a New Topic | Messages in this topic (8) |
Search the official Complete Avid-L archives at: http://archives.bengrosser.com/avid/
.
__,_._,___
No comments:
Post a Comment